Kadoch Cigall, Li Jing, Wong Valerie S, Chen Lingjing, Cha Soonmee, Munster Pamela, Lowell Clifford A, Shuman Marc A, Rubenstein James L
Authors' Affiliations: Division of Hematology/Oncology, Genentech, South San Francisco; Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center; and Department of Radiology, Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 15;20(4):1029-41. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0474. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
To elucidate the mechanistic basis for efficacy of intrathecal rituximab. We evaluated complement activation as well as the pharmacokinetics of intraventricular rituximab in patients who participated in two phase 1 multicenter studies.
We evaluated complement activation as a candidate mediator of rituximab within the central nervous system (CNS). Complement C3 and C5b-9 were quantified by ELISA in serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens after intraventricular rituximab administration. We determined rituximab concentration profiles in CSF and serum. A population three- compartment pharmacokinetic model was built to describe the disposition of rituximab following intraventricular administration. The model was derived from results of the first trial and validated with results of the second trial.
Complement C3 and C5b-9 were reproducibly activated in CSF after intraventricular rituximab. Ectopic expression of C3 mRNA and protein within CNS lymphoma lesions was localized to myeloid cells. Constitutive high C3 activation at baseline was associated with adverse prognosis. A pharmacokinetic model was built, which contains three distinct compartments, to describe the distribution of rituximab within the neuroaxis after intraventricular administration.
We provide the first evidence of C3 activation within the neuroaxis with intraventricular immunotherapy and suggest that complement may contribute to immunotherapeutic responses of rituximab in CNS lymphoma. Penetration of rituximab into neural tissue is supported by this pharmacokinetic model and may contribute to efficacy. These findings have general implications for intraventricular immunotherapy. Our data highlight potential innovations to improve efficacy of intraventricular immunotherapy both via modulation of the innate immune response as well as innovations in drug delivery.
阐明鞘内注射利妥昔单抗疗效的作用机制。我们评估了参与两项1期多中心研究的患者脑室内利妥昔单抗的补体激活情况及药代动力学。
我们评估补体激活作为利妥昔单抗在中枢神经系统(CNS)中的候选介质。在脑室内注射利妥昔单抗后,通过酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)对连续的脑脊液(CSF)标本中的补体C3和C5b-9进行定量。我们测定了脑脊液和血清中的利妥昔单抗浓度曲线。建立了一个群体三室药代动力学模型来描述脑室内给药后利妥昔单抗的处置情况。该模型源自第一项试验的结果,并用第二项试验的结果进行了验证。
脑室内注射利妥昔单抗后,脑脊液中的补体C3和C5b-9可重复性激活。C3 mRNA和蛋白在中枢神经系统淋巴瘤病变中的异位表达定位于髓样细胞。基线时持续的高C3激活与不良预后相关。建立了一个包含三个不同房室的药代动力学模型,以描述脑室内给药后利妥昔单抗在神经轴内的分布情况。
我们首次提供了脑室内免疫治疗后神经轴内C3激活的证据,并表明补体可能有助于利妥昔单抗在中枢神经系统淋巴瘤中的免疫治疗反应。该药代动力学模型支持利妥昔单抗穿透进入神经组织,这可能有助于其疗效。这些发现对脑室内免疫治疗具有普遍意义。我们的数据突出了通过调节先天免疫反应以及药物递送创新来提高脑室内免疫治疗疗效的潜在创新点。