Di Maio Massimo, Morabito Alessandro, Piccirillo Maria Carmela, Daniele Gennaro, Giordano Pasqualina, Costanzo Raffaele, Sandomenico Claudia, Montanino Agnese, Rocco Gaetano, Perrone Francesco
Clinical Trials Unit, National Cancer Institute - "G. Pascale" Foundation, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(24):3901-13. doi: 10.2174/13816128113196660762.
Drugs directed against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), namely tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib, and anti-angiogenic agents, namely the anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) antibody bevacizumab, have independently demonstrated clinical benefit in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and are currently approved for use in clinical practice. Pre-clinical studies have shown promising results with the combination of anti-EGFR and anti-angiogenesis drugs in different tumor models, including NSCLC. Several clinical trials have been conducted to verify if the combination of the two therapeutic strategies could improve the outcome in the setting of advanced NSCLC. The largest body of evidence has been produced testing the combination of erlotinib plus bevacizumab, or erlotinib plus a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, namely sunitinib or sorafenib. Furthermore, several dual inhibitors, targeting both EGFR and VEGFR, have been tested in advanced NSCLC, with the greatest body of evidence produced with vandetanib. However, despite an intriguing pre-clinical background, the combination strategy has not yet produced clinically relevant results. Several phase III trials showed an improvement in progression-free survival, underlining some activity of targeting both pathways concurrently, but no trial has demonstrated an impact on overall survival to date. Unfortunately, the vast majority of trials conducted in this setting have been performed without any selection criteria based on molecular characteristics, compromising the chance of detecting a potentially relevant benefit in selected subgroup of patients. In recent years, the important interaction between the efficacy of EGFR inhibitors and the presence of EGFR activating mutations in tumor cells has been repeatedly demonstrated. On the other hand, we still have no clear idea about predictive factors of efficacy for bevacizumab and other anti-angiogenic drugs. This is probably the real challenge to optimize the use of these drugs and to fully evaluate the real clinical potential of a combination strategy.
针对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的药物,即酪氨酸激酶抑制剂厄洛替尼和吉非替尼,以及抗血管生成药物,即抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抗体贝伐单抗,已分别在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的治疗中显示出临床获益,目前已获批用于临床实践。临床前研究表明,在包括NSCLC在内的不同肿瘤模型中,抗EGFR药物与抗血管生成药物联合使用具有良好前景。已经开展了多项临床试验,以验证这两种治疗策略联合使用是否能改善晚期NSCLC患者的治疗效果。在测试厄洛替尼联合贝伐单抗,或厄洛替尼联合多靶点受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(即舒尼替尼或索拉非尼)的研究中,产生了最多的证据。此外,几种同时靶向EGFR和VEGFR的双重抑制剂已在晚期NSCLC中进行了测试,其中凡德他尼产生的证据最多。然而,尽管有引人关注的临床前背景,但联合治疗策略尚未产生具有临床意义的结果。几项III期试验显示无进展生存期有所改善,突显了同时靶向两条通路的一定活性,但迄今为止尚无试验证明对总生存期有影响。不幸的是,在这种情况下进行的绝大多数试验都没有基于分子特征的任何选择标准,从而降低了在特定患者亚组中检测到潜在相关获益的可能性。近年来,EGFR抑制剂的疗效与肿瘤细胞中EGFR激活突变的存在之间的重要相互作用已得到反复证实。另一方面,我们对贝伐单抗和其他抗血管生成药物疗效的预测因素仍不清楚。这可能是优化这些药物使用并充分评估联合治疗策略真正临床潜力的真正挑战。