Suppr超能文献

弥散加权磁共振成像、11C-胆碱 PET 和 18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖 PET 预测前列腺癌 Gleason 评分。

Diffusion-weighted MRI, 11C-choline PET and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for predicting the Gleason score in prostate carcinoma.

机构信息

Radiation Oncology Centre, Austin Health, 300 Waterdale Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia,

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2014 Mar;24(3):715-22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3045-1. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy, diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), (11)C-choline (CHOL) positron emission tomography (PET), and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in predicting the prostatectomy Gleason risk (GR).

METHODS

The study included 21 patients who underwent TRUS biopsy and multi-technique imaging before radical prostatectomy. Values from five different tests (TRUS biopsy, DW MRI, CHOL PET, FDG PET, and combined DW MRI/CHOL PET) were correlated with the prostatectomy GR using Spearman's ρ. Tests that were found to have significant correlations were used to classify patients into GR groups.

RESULTS

The following tests had significant correlations with prostatectomy GR: TRUS biopsy (ρ = 0.617, P = 0.003), DW MRI (ρ = -0.601, P = 0.004), and combined DW MRI/CHOL PET (ρ = -0.623, P = 0.003). CHOL PET alone and FDG PET only had weak correlations. The correct GR classification rates were 67% with TRUS biopsy, 67% with DW MRI, and 76% with combined DW MRI/CHOL PET.

CONCLUSIONS

DW MRI and combined DW MRI/CHOL PET have significant correlations and high rates of correct classification of the prostatectomy GR, the strength and accuracy of which are comparable with TRUS biopsy.

KEY POINTS

• Accurate determination of the Gleason score is essential for prostate cancer management. • DW MRI ± CHOL PET correlated significantly with prostatectomy Gleason score. • These correlations are similar to that between TRUS biopsy and prostatectomy.

摘要

目的

评估经直肠超声引导(TRUS)活检、弥散加权(DW)磁共振成像(MRI)、(11)C-胆碱(CHOL)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和(18)F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET 在预测前列腺切除术 Gleason 风险(GR)中的准确性。

方法

本研究纳入了 21 例在根治性前列腺切除术前接受 TRUS 活检和多技术成像的患者。使用 Spearman ρ 相关分析比较五种不同检测方法(TRUS 活检、DW MRI、CHOL PET、FDG PET 和联合 DW MRI/CHOL PET)的检测值与前列腺切除术 GR 的相关性。对具有显著相关性的检测方法用于将患者分类为 GR 组。

结果

以下检测方法与前列腺切除术 GR 具有显著相关性:TRUS 活检(ρ=0.617,P=0.003)、DW MRI(ρ=-0.601,P=0.004)和联合 DW MRI/CHOL PET(ρ=-0.623,P=0.003)。CHOL PET 单独和 FDG PET 仅具有弱相关性。TRUS 活检的正确 GR 分类率为 67%,DW MRI 为 67%,联合 DW MRI/CHOL PET 为 76%。

结论

DW MRI 和联合 DW MRI/CHOL PET 与前列腺切除术 GR 具有显著相关性和较高的正确分类率,其强度和准确性与 TRUS 活检相当。

重点

  1. 准确确定 Gleason 评分对于前列腺癌的管理至关重要。

  2. DW MRI±CHOL PET 与前列腺切除术 Gleason 评分显著相关。

  3. 这些相关性与 TRUS 活检与前列腺切除术之间的相关性相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验