Herbst Sophie K, Javadi Amir Homayoun, van der Meer Elke, Busch Niko A
Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Berlin, Germany ; Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 23;8(10):e76074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076074. eCollection 2013.
How do humans perceive the passage of time and the duration of events without a dedicated sensory system for timing? Previous studies have demonstrated that when a stimulus changes over time, its duration is subjectively dilated, indicating that duration judgments are based on the number of changes within an interval. In this study, we tested predictions derived from three different accounts describing the relation between a changing stimulus and its subjective duration as either based on (1) the objective rate of changes of the stimulus, (2) the perceived saliency of the changes, or (3) the neural energy expended in processing the stimulus. We used visual stimuli flickering at different frequencies (4-166 Hz) to study how the number of changes affects subjective duration. To this end, we assessed the subjective duration of these stimuli and measured participants' behavioral flicker fusion threshold (the highest frequency perceived as flicker), as well as their threshold for a frequency-specific neural response to the flicker using EEG. We found that only consciously perceived flicker dilated perceived duration, such that a 2 s long stimulus flickering at 4 Hz was perceived as lasting as long as a 2.7 s steady stimulus. This effect was most pronounced at the slowest flicker frequencies, at which participants reported the most consistent flicker perception. Flicker frequencies higher than the flicker fusion threshold did not affect perceived duration at all, even if they evoked a significant frequency-specific neural response. In sum, our findings indicate that time perception in the peri-second range is driven by the subjective saliency of the stimulus' temporal features rather than the objective rate of stimulus changes or the neural response to the changes.
人类如何在没有专门的计时感觉系统的情况下感知时间的流逝和事件的持续时间?先前的研究表明,当刺激随时间变化时,其持续时间会被主观延长,这表明持续时间的判断是基于一个时间间隔内的变化数量。在本研究中,我们测试了从三种不同解释得出的预测,这些解释描述了变化的刺激与其主观持续时间之间的关系,分别基于:(1)刺激的客观变化率;(2)变化的感知显著性;(3)处理刺激时消耗的神经能量。我们使用以不同频率(4 - 166赫兹)闪烁的视觉刺激来研究变化数量如何影响主观持续时间。为此,我们评估了这些刺激的主观持续时间,并测量了参与者的行为闪烁融合阈值(被感知为闪烁的最高频率),以及他们使用脑电图对闪烁的频率特异性神经反应阈值。我们发现,只有有意识地感知到的闪烁会延长感知到的持续时间,例如,一个持续2秒、以4赫兹闪烁的刺激被感知为与一个持续2.7秒的稳定刺激持续时间相同。这种效应在最低闪烁频率时最为明显,此时参与者报告的闪烁感知最为一致。高于闪烁融合阈值的闪烁频率根本不会影响感知到的持续时间,即使它们引发了显著的频率特异性神经反应。总之,我们的研究结果表明,秒级范围内的时间感知是由刺激的时间特征的主观显著性驱动的,而不是刺激变化的客观速率或对这些变化的神经反应。