Share Bianca L, Naughton Geraldine A, Obert Philippe, Peat Jennifer K, Kemp Justin G
School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Australia.
School of Exercise Science, Australian Catholic University, Australia.
J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Nov;17(6):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
This study aimed to (1) investigate cardiometabolic risk markers in young women (18-30 years) with overweight/obesity, and (2) establish whether the measures of waist circumference and body mass index possess similar associations of cardiometabolic risk.
Cross-sectional.
Cardiometabolic risk factors including, anthropometric, metabolic syndrome markers, biochemical, and other health/fitness indicators were assessed in women when classified as overweight/obese by waist circumference [waist circumference 91.9 ± 10.1 cm, age 22.3 ± 3.5 years, n = 38] versus control [n = 30, waist circumference 71.4 ± 3.5 cm, age 20.1 ± 0.9 years], and when classified by body mass index [n=35, body mass index 32.2 ± 5.2 kg m(2), age 22.5 ± 3.6 years] versus control [body mass index 21.7 ± 1.9 kg m(2), age 20.1 ± 0.9 years, n=33].
Compared with controls, women with overweight/obesity (classified by waist circumference or body mass index) displayed elevated body mass, systolic blood pressure and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, and reduced estimated [Formula: see text] and weekly physical activity, with no differences in self-reported energy intake. The unadjusted odds ratio of being classified with overweight/obesity and an elevated homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and/or less than recommended physical activity ranged between 5.1 and 10.0. Receiver operator characteristic curves indicated waist circumference, body mass index and waist-to-height ratio cut-off points of ≥ 84.2 cm, ≥ 30.6 kg m(-2) and ≥ 0.5, respectively, for homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, and ≥ 80.6 cm, ≥ 25.2 kg m(-2) and ≥ 0.46, respectively, for less than recommended physical activity.
Waist circumference and body mass index have similar associations with cardiometabolic risk, with greater homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance and lower physical activity, rather than differences in traditional metabolic syndrome markers, observed in young women with overweight/obesity.
本研究旨在(1)调查超重/肥胖的年轻女性(18 - 30岁)的心脏代谢风险标志物,以及(2)确定腰围和体重指数测量值与心脏代谢风险的关联是否相似。
横断面研究。
对根据腰围分类为超重/肥胖的女性[腰围91.9±10.1厘米,年龄22.3±3.5岁,n = 38]与对照组[n = 30,腰围71.4±3.5厘米,年龄20.1±0.9岁],以及根据体重指数分类的女性[n = 35,体重指数32.2±5.2千克/米²,年龄22.5±3.6岁]与对照组[体重指数21.7±1.9千克/米²,年龄20.1±0.9岁,n = 33],评估其心脏代谢风险因素,包括人体测量学、代谢综合征标志物、生化指标以及其他健康/健身指标。
与对照组相比,超重/肥胖女性(根据腰围或体重指数分类)体重、收缩压和胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估值升高,估计的[公式:见正文]和每周身体活动量降低,自我报告的能量摄入量无差异。超重/肥胖且胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估值升高和/或身体活动量低于推荐水平的未调整比值比在5.1至10.0之间。受试者工作特征曲线表明,对于胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估,腰围、体重指数和腰高比的截断点分别≥84.2厘米、≥30.6千克/米²和≥0.5,对于身体活动量低于推荐水平,截断点分别≥80.6厘米、≥25.2千克/米²和≥0.46。
腰围和体重指数与心脏代谢风险的关联相似,在超重/肥胖的年轻女性中观察到胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估值更高且身体活动量更低,而非传统代谢综合征标志物存在差异。