Suppr超能文献

保守性锐器伤清创术:加拿大教育、实践、风险和政策概述。

Conservative sharp wound debridement: an overview of Canadian education, practice, risk, and policy.

机构信息

Elise Rodd-Nielsen, RN, BSN, IIWCC, CETN (C), ERodd-Nielsen Consulting, Quebec, Canada. Connie L. Harris, RN, ET, IIWCC, MSc, Red Cross Care Partners, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 Nov-Dec;40(6):594-601. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182a9ae8c.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe the education, policy, practice, and risk management strategies of nurses performing conservative sharp wound debridement (CSWD) in Canada, prior to the release of the Canadian Association for Enterostomal Therapy Evidence-Based Recommendations for Conservative Sharp Wound Debridement.

DESIGN

Data collection was based on a nonrandomized, nonexperimental study design and reported using descriptive statistics.

METHODS

Invitations for health care professionals to participate in a CSWD scan were sent to 4315 people via e-mail through the membership lists of 2 Canadian voluntary professional wound care associations. Skip logic screened out respondents who had no experience in CSWD (n = 57). The total number of professionals who participated was 487. A 26-question electronic scan addressed demographics, education, policy, practice, and risk/quality issues related to CSWD. A comment section was included for some questions.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

A selected subsample of 397 nurses was chosen from the original total of 487 respondents. Nonnurse respondents were excluded due to the low total number of participants in each of these other professional categories.

RESULTS

Nurses perform CSWD in all types of care settings in Canada from outpost nursing stations to hospital wards, homes, and long-term care facilities. The wound education preparation reported varied. The most frequently reported formal wound care education was a 2-day course (59%; n = 220), followed by an enterostomal therapy course (42%; n = 155) and the International Interdisciplinary Wound Care Course (26%; n = 98), with overlapping preparation evident. Eleven percent of respondents (n = 47) reported having taken no formal wound course, and 7% (n = 27) taught themselves to perform CSWD. Twenty-eight percent of nurses (n = 112) were unclear about whether CSWD was within their scope of practice or replied that it was not, and 69% (n = 273) did not know if there was provincial legislation that restricted their practice of CSWD. Forty-eight percent of nurses (n = 181) reported that their institutions do not have policies on CSWD, and 9% (n = 35) did not know. Adverse events associated with CSWD were reported by 196 respondents, with minor bleeding reported most frequently (98% n = 192) by those who answered the question.

CONCLUSIONS

The education, policy, practice, and risk management of nurses practicing CSWD could benefit from development and dissemination of a set of National Standards and Competencies for this high-risk wound intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述加拿大护士在进行保守性锐性清创(CSWD)之前的教育、政策、实践和风险管理策略,此时加拿大造口治疗师协会的保守性锐性清创循证推荐刚刚发布。

设计

数据收集基于非随机、非实验性研究设计,并使用描述性统计进行报告。

方法

通过 2 个加拿大志愿性伤口护理协会的会员名单,向 4315 人发送电子邮件邀请医疗保健专业人员参与 CSWD 扫描。跳过逻辑筛选掉没有 CSWD 经验的受访者(n=57)。共有 487 名专业人员参与。26 个问题的电子扫描涉及与 CSWD 相关的人口统计学、教育、政策、实践和风险/质量问题。部分问题包含评论部分。

受试者和环境

从最初的 487 名受访者中选择了 397 名护士作为一个选定的子样本。由于每个其他专业类别的参与者总数都很低,因此排除了非护士受访者。

结果

加拿大的护士在从前沿护理站到医院病房、家庭和长期护理机构的所有类型的护理环境中都进行 CSWD。报告的伤口教育准备情况各不相同。最常报告的正式伤口护理教育是为期 2 天的课程(59%,n=220),其次是造口治疗课程(42%,n=155)和国际跨学科伤口护理课程(26%,n=98),明显存在重叠的准备情况。11%的受访者(n=47)表示没有参加过任何正式的伤口课程,7%(n=27)自学进行 CSWD。28%的护士(n=112)不清楚 CSWD 是否在其执业范围内,或表示不在其执业范围内,69%(n=273)不知道是否有省级法规限制他们进行 CSWD。48%的护士(n=181)报告他们的机构没有 CSWD 政策,9%(n=35)不知道。196 名受访者报告了与 CSWD 相关的不良事件,其中最常报告的是轻微出血(98%,n=192)。

结论

从事 CSWD 的护士的教育、政策、实践和风险管理可以从一套针对这种高风险伤口干预的国家标准和能力的制定和传播中受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验