Suppr超能文献

早发性和晚发性强迫症患者的 N2 和 P3 电位。

N2 and P3 potentials in early-onset and late-onset patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2014 Dec;31(12):997-1006. doi: 10.1002/da.22212. Epub 2013 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Impaired cognitive control processes may be central in the pathogenesis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Our objective was to evaluate cognitive control processes with event-related potentials in early-onset OCD (EO) and late-onset OCD (LO), which are suggested to have distinct characteristics.

METHODS

Participants were unmedicated EO (n = 26) and LO patients (n = 33) without comorbid psychopathology and healthy controls (n = 54). Go/No-go tasks with 50 and 80% Go trial probabilities were implemented to manipulate the strength of response conflict and inhibitory demands.

RESULTS

LO patients had shorter N2 latencies than controls and did not show the N2 amplitude increase seen in controls with the increase in Go trial probability as suggestive of abnormal conflict monitoring processes. Both EO and LO patients showed smaller P3 increase than controls with the increase in Go trial probability, suggesting problems in modifying attentional control with changes in task demands. P3 was more anteriorly distributed in LO patients than controls. Additionally, P3 increase, with the increase in Go trial probability, was larger in frontal and central sites than in parietal sites in controls, whereas in EO patients it was almost homogenous across anteroposterior sites.

CONCLUSIONS

N2 processes were affected only in LO, whereas P3 processes were affected in both EO and LO, although, somewhat differently. P3 distributions suggest that EO and LO patients have differences concerning the contributions of frontal and parietal components of attentional networks to the execution of Go/No-go tasks. Our results imply that EO and LO are distinct subtypes affecting the cognitive control systems differently.

摘要

背景

认知控制过程受损可能是强迫症(OCD)发病机制的核心。我们的目的是评估早期发病强迫症(EO)和晚期发病强迫症(LO)的认知控制过程,这两种疾病被认为具有不同的特征。

方法

参与者为未经药物治疗的 EO(n=26)和 LO 患者(n=33),无共病精神病理学,以及健康对照组(n=54)。实施 Go/No-go 任务,Go 试验概率为 50%和 80%,以操纵反应冲突和抑制需求的强度。

结果

LO 患者的 N2 潜伏期短于对照组,且随着 Go 试验概率的增加,N2 振幅增加,表明异常冲突监测过程。EO 和 LO 患者的 P3 增幅均小于对照组,随着 Go 试验概率的增加,表明在任务需求变化时,注意力控制的调整存在问题。与对照组相比,LO 患者的 P3 分布更靠前。此外,与对照组相比,P3 随 Go 试验概率的增加,在前额和中央部位的增幅大于顶叶部位,而在 EO 患者中,几乎在前后部位均匀分布。

结论

仅在 LO 中 N2 过程受到影响,而在 EO 和 LO 中 P3 过程受到影响,尽管存在一些差异。P3 分布表明,EO 和 LO 患者在执行 Go/No-go 任务时,注意力网络的额部和顶叶成分的贡献存在差异。我们的结果表明,EO 和 LO 是不同的亚型,对认知控制系统的影响不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验