Department of Biochemistry and Soil Science, University College of North Wales, Bangor, LL57 2UW, Gwynedd.
Planta. 1988 Apr;174(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00394866.
The hydraulic conductivities of excised whole root systems of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Atou) and of single excised roots of wheat and maize (Zea mays L. cv. Passat) were measured using an osmotically induced back-flow technique. Ninety minutes after excision the values for single excised roots ranged from 1.6·10(-8) to 5.5·10(-8) m·s(-1)·MPa(-1) in wheat and from 0.9·10(-8) to 4.8·10(-8) m·s(-1)·MPa(-1) in maize. The main source of variation was a decrease in the value as root length increased. The hydraulic conductivities of whole root systems, but not of single excised roots, were smaller 15 h after excision. This was not caused by occlusion of the xylem at the cut end of the coleoptile. The hydraulic conductivities of epidermal, cortical and endodermal cells were measured using a pressure probe. Epidermal and cortical cells of both wheat and maize roots gave mean values of 1.2·10(-7) m·s(-1)·MPa(-1) but in endodermal cells (measured only in wheat) the mean value was 0.5·10(-7) m·s(-1)·MPa(-1). The cellular hydraulic conductivities were used to calculate the root hydraulic conductivities expected if water flow across the root was via transcellular (vacuole-to-vacuole), apoplasmic or symplasmic pathways. The results indicate that, in freshly excised roots, the bulk of water flow is unlikely to be via the transcellular pathway. This is in contrast to our previous conclusion (H. Jones, A.D. Tomos, R.A. Leigh and R.G. Wyn Jones 1983, Planta 158, 230-236) which was based on results obtained with whole root systems of wheat measured 14-15 h after excision and which probably gave artefactually low values for root hydraulic conductivity. It is now concluded that, near the root tip, water flow could be through a symplasmic pathway in which the only substantial resistances to water flow are provided by the outer epidermal and the inner endodermal plasma membranes. Further from the tip, the measured hydraulic conductivities of the roots are consistent with flow either through the symplasmic or apoplasmic pathways.
使用渗透压诱导回流技术测量了离体完整小麦(Triticum aestivum L. cv. Atou)根系和离体单根小麦和玉米(Zea mays L. cv. Passat)的水力传导率。离体 90 分钟后,单根的水力传导率在小麦中为 1.6·10(-8) 至 5.5·10(-8) m·s(-1)·MPa(-1),在玉米中为 0.9·10(-8) 至 4.8·10(-8) m·s(-1)·MPa(-1)。变化的主要来源是随着根长的增加而降低。整个根系的水力传导率,但不是离体单根的水力传导率,在离体 15 小时后较小。这不是由于 coleoptile 切割端木质部的堵塞造成的。使用压力探针测量表皮、皮层和内皮层细胞的水力传导率。小麦和玉米根的表皮和皮层细胞的平均值为 1.2·10(-7) m·s(-1)·MPa(-1),但在内皮层细胞(仅在小麦中测量)的平均值为 0.5·10(-7) m·s(-1)·MPa(-1)。细胞水力传导率用于计算如果水通过质外体、共质体或胞间途径流过根,则预期的根水力传导率。结果表明,在刚离体的根中,大部分水流不太可能通过胞间途径。这与我们之前的结论(H. Jones、A.D. Tomos、R.A. Leigh 和 R.G. Wyn Jones 1983,Planta 158,230-236)形成对比,该结论基于离体 14-15 小时后测量的小麦整个根系获得,可能导致根水力传导率的人为低值。现在得出的结论是,在根尖附近,水流可能通过胞间途径,其中对水流的唯一主要阻力是由外表皮和内皮层质膜提供的。离根尖越远,根系的测量水力传导率与通过共质体或质外体途径的流动一致。