a Exemplary Academic Integrity Project , University of South Australia Business School, University of South Australia , Adelaide , Australia.
Account Res. 2014;21(2):122-37. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.847668.
Postgraduate research students have a unique position in the debate on integrity in research as students and novice researchers. To assess how far policies for integrity in postgraduate research meet the needs of students as "research trainees," we reviewed online policies for integrity in postgraduate research at nine particular Australian universities against the Australian Code for Responsible Conduct of Research (the Code) and the five core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy identified by Bretag et al. (2011 ), i.e., access, approach, responsibility, detail, and support. We found inconsistency with the Code in the definition of research misconduct and a lack of adequate detail and support. Based on our analysis, previous research, and the literature, we propose a framework for policy and support for postgraduate research that encompasses a consistent and educative approach to integrity maintained across the university at all levels of scholarship and for all stakeholders.
研究生在研究诚信方面的争论中处于独特的地位，既是学生也是新手研究人员。为了评估研究生研究诚信政策在多大程度上满足了学生作为“研究培训生”的需求，我们根据澳大利亚负责任研究行为准则（准则）以及 Bretag 等人（2011 年）确定的示范性学术诚信政策的五个核心要素，即获取、方法、责任、细节和支持，对澳大利亚九所特定大学的在线研究生研究诚信政策进行了审查。我们发现，在研究不端行为的定义方面与准则不一致，而且缺乏足够的细节和支持。基于我们的分析、先前的研究和文献，我们提出了一个涵盖整个大学各级奖学金和所有利益相关者的诚信一致和教育方法的研究生研究政策和支持框架。
