Edelsohn Gail A, Schuster James M, Castelnovo Kim, Terhorst Lauren, Parthasarathy Meghna
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Feb 1;65(2):201-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300029.
Prescribing patterns of psychotropic medication over a five-year period for Medicaid recipients (adults and children) with codiagnoses of an intellectual disability and a mental disorder were compared with patterns for those with sole mental disorder diagnoses.
Each group was identified through paid behavioral health services claims. Four classes of medications (antidepressants, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and mood stabilizers) were examined in paid pharmacy claims. Diagnostic categories, rates of psychotropic prescription, and polypharmacy (three or more medications concurrently for 90 days or more) were compared by age group (child or adult).
Adults with mental disorders only (N=793 to 883; the range reflects the five study years) were prescribed antidepressants at a significantly higher rate compared with adults in the codiagnosis group (N=184 to 217). For three of the five study years, antipsychotics were prescribed to the sole-diagnosis group of adults at a significantly higher rate than to those with codiagnoses. Children in the group with codiagnoses (N=108 to 141) were prescribed mood stabilizers at a significantly higher rate than the comparison group (N=638 to 728) in all five study years. Rates of antipsychotics prescribed were not statistically different between the two groups of children. Polypharmacy rates for both adults and children were higher for the codiagnosis group compared with the group with a sole mental disorder, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.
Psychotropic prescribing patterns in the two groups studied varied by class of medication and age. Although evidence exists for using psychotropics to treat psychopathology and challenging behaviors among individuals with intellectual disabilities, consideration of behavioral intervention alternatives and careful monitoring of psychotropic effectiveness and side effects are recommended.
比较智力残疾合并精神障碍的医疗补助受助者(成人和儿童)在五年期间的精神药物处方模式与仅患有精神障碍诊断者的处方模式。
通过付费行为健康服务索赔识别每组人员。在付费药房索赔中检查四类药物(抗抑郁药、抗精神病药、苯二氮䓬类药物和心境稳定剂)。按年龄组(儿童或成人)比较诊断类别、精神药物处方率和多药联用情况(同时使用三种或更多药物达90天或更长时间)。
仅患有精神障碍的成人(N = 793至883;范围反映五个研究年份)与合并诊断组的成人(N = 184至217)相比,抗抑郁药的处方率显著更高。在五个研究年份中的三年里,成人单诊断组的抗精神病药处方率显著高于合并诊断组。在所有五个研究年份中,合并诊断组的儿童(N = 108至141)的心境稳定剂处方率显著高于对照组(N = 638至728)。两组儿童的抗精神病药处方率无统计学差异。与仅患有精神障碍的组相比,合并诊断组的成人和儿童的多药联用率更高,但差异未达到统计学显著性。
所研究的两组中的精神药物处方模式因药物类别和年龄而异。尽管有证据表明使用精神药物治疗智力残疾者的精神病理学和挑战行为,但建议考虑行为干预替代方案并仔细监测精神药物的有效性和副作用。