Suppr超能文献

胸腺疾病手术方式的比较:电视辅助胸腔镜手术胸腺切除术的可行性及与小切口手术和正中胸骨切开术的比较

[Comparison of surgical approaches for thymic disorders: feasibility of VATS thymectomy and comparison with small incision and median sternotomy].

作者信息

Mao Teng, Gu Zhi-tao, Fang Wen-tao, Chen Wen-hu

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai 200030, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;51(8):737-40.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and to compare surgical results of VATS with standard median sternotomy (MS) and other minimal invasive approaches through various small incisions (SI).

METHODS

Totally 111 patients underwent surgery for thymic disorders (maximun diameter ≤ 5 cm, clinical stage I-II for thymic tumors) during March 2010 to June 2012 was retrospectively reviewed. There were 46 male and 65 female patients with a mean age of (51 ± 15) years.Resection via VATS was carried out in 47 patients, via SI in 26 patients, and via MS in 38 patients. Demographic characteristics, operation time, number and cause of conversion, blood loss during operation, duration and amount of chest tube drainage, transfusion, morbidity, and length of hospital stay (LHS) were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

Of the 111 patients, 79 patients had thymic epithelia tumors (stage I 32 patients, stage II 39 patients, stage III 8 patients), 31 patients had benign cysts and 1 patient had tuberculosis.In the VATS group, there were 3 conversions among 38 patients through right-side approach, and 4 conversions among 9 patients through left-side approach. The causes for conversion included dense pleura adhesion, invasion of tumor into adjacent structures (pericardium, lung, or great vessels), and injury of the left inominate vein. There was no significant difference in operative time, blood loss or transfusion during operation, duration or amount of postoperative chest tube drainage among the 3 groups (P > 0.05). Average LHS was significantly shorter in the VATS group (5.7 ± 1.7) days than in the SI group (7.5 ± 2.2) days and the MS group (8.2 ± 1.9) days (F = 3.759, P = 0.002). Total thymectomy was performed in 74 patients, 25 patients (53.2%, 25/47) in VATS group, 11 patients (42.3%, 11/26) in SI group, and 38 patients (100%, 38/38) in MS group. The reset of the patients received tumor resection and partial thymectomy. Among all the subgroups, LHS was the shortest in VATS total thymectomy patients (5.0 ± 1.4) days (F = 5.844, P = 0.001). There was no perioperative mortality. The only major morbidity was a postoperative bleeding necessitating reintervention in SI group.

CONCLUSIONS

VATS for benign thymic lesions and early-stage thymic tumors is safe and feasible.It is associated with shorter hospital stay compared with other minimal invasive approaches or standard sternotomy.

摘要

目的

评估电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的可行性和安全性,并比较VATS与标准正中胸骨切开术(MS)及其他通过不同小切口(SI)的微创方法的手术效果。

方法

回顾性分析2010年3月至2012年6月期间111例行胸腺疾病手术(胸腺肿瘤最大直径≤5 cm,临床分期为I-II期)的患者。其中男性46例,女性65例,平均年龄(51±15)岁。47例患者采用VATS切除,26例患者采用SI切除,38例患者采用MS切除。比较三组患者的人口统计学特征、手术时间、中转次数及原因、术中出血量、胸腔闭式引流时间及引流量、输血情况、发病率和住院时间(LHS)。

结果

111例患者中,79例为胸腺上皮肿瘤(I期32例,II期39例,III期8例),31例为良性囊肿,1例为结核。在VATS组中,38例经右侧入路的患者中有3例中转,9例经左侧入路的患者中有4例中转。中转原因包括致密胸膜粘连、肿瘤侵犯相邻结构(心包、肺或大血管)以及左无名静脉损伤。三组患者的手术时间、术中出血量或输血量、术后胸腔闭式引流时间及引流量差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。VATS组的平均LHS(5.7±1.7)天明显短于SI组(7.5±2.2)天和MS组(8.2±1.9)天(F=3.759,P=0.002)。74例患者行全胸腺切除术,VATS组25例(53.2%,25/47),SI组11例(42.3%,11/26),MS组38例(100%,38/38)。其余患者行肿瘤切除及部分胸腺切除术。在所有亚组中,VATS全胸腺切除术患者的LHS最短(5.0±1.4)天(F=5.844,P=0.001)。无围手术期死亡。唯一的主要并发症是SI组术后出血需要再次干预。

结论

VATS治疗良性胸腺病变和早期胸腺肿瘤是安全可行的。与其他微创方法或标准胸骨切开术相比,其住院时间更短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验