Suppr超能文献

踝关节联合损伤的临床检查诊断准确性。

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for ankle syndesmosis injury.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia.

Sports Clinic, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;49(5):323-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092787. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the clinical presentation of ankle syndesmosis injury and four common clinical diagnostic tests.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study.

SETTING

9 clinics in two Australian cities.

PARTICIPANTS

87 participants (78% male) with an ankle sprain injury presenting to participating clinics within 2 weeks of injury were enrolled.

METHODS

Clinical presentation, dorsiflexion-external rotation stress test, dorsiflexion lunge with compression test, squeeze test and ankle syndesmosis ligament palpation were compared with MRI results (read by a blinded radiologist) as a reference standard. Tests were evaluated using diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LRs). A backwards stepwise Cox regression model determined the combined value of the clinical tests.

RESULTS

The clinical presentation of an inability to perform a single leg hop had the highest sensitivity (89%) with a negative LR of 0.37 (95% CI 0.13 to 1.03). Specificity was highest for pain out of proportion to the apparent injury (79%) with a positive LR of 3.05(95% CI 1.68 to 5.55). Of the clinical tests, the squeeze test had the highest specificity (88%) with a positive LR of 2.15 (95% CI 0.86 to 5.39). Syndesmosis ligament tenderness (92%) and the dorsiflexion-external rotation stress test (71%) had the highest sensitivity values and negative LR of 0.28 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.89) and 0.46 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.79), respectively. Syndesmosis injury was four times more likely to be present with positive syndesmosis ligament tenderness (OR 4.04, p=0.048) or a positive dorsiflexion/external rotation stress test (OR 3.9, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Although no single test is sufficiently accurate for diagnosis, we recommend a combination of sensitive and specific signs, symptoms and tests to confirm ankle syndesmosis involvement. An inability to hop, syndesmosis ligament tenderness and the dorsiflexion-external rotation stress test (sensitive) may be combined with pain out of proportion to injury and the squeeze test (specific).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨踝关节联合损伤的临床表现和四种常见临床诊断试验的诊断准确性。

设计

横断面诊断准确性研究。

地点

澳大利亚两个城市的 9 个诊所。

参与者

87 名参与者(78%为男性),在损伤后 2 周内到参与诊所就诊,均为踝关节扭伤。

方法

将临床表现、背屈-外旋应力试验、背屈-弓步加压试验、挤压试验和踝关节联合韧带触诊与 MRI 结果(由一位盲法放射科医生解读)进行比较,作为参考标准。使用诊断准确性、敏感度、特异度和似然比(LRs)来评估试验。使用向后逐步 Cox 回归模型确定临床检查的综合价值。

结果

无法进行单腿跳跃的临床表现具有最高的敏感度(89%),阴性似然比为 0.37(95%CI 0.13 至 1.03)。与明显损伤不成比例的疼痛对特异性的影响最大(79%),阳性似然比为 3.05(95%CI 1.68 至 5.55)。在临床检查中,挤压试验的特异性最高(88%),阳性似然比为 2.15(95%CI 0.86 至 5.39)。联合韧带压痛(92%)和背屈-外旋应力试验(71%)的敏感度最高,阴性似然比分别为 0.28(95%CI 0.09 至 0.89)和 0.46(95%CI 0.27 至 0.79)。联合韧带压痛(OR 4.04,p=0.048)或背屈-外旋应力试验阳性(OR 3.9,p=0.004)时,联合损伤的可能性增加 4 倍。

结论

尽管没有任何单一的检查足够准确进行诊断,但我们建议结合敏感和特异的体征、症状和检查来确认踝关节联合损伤的存在。无法跳跃、联合韧带压痛和背屈-外旋应力试验(敏感)可与与损伤不成比例的疼痛和挤压试验(特异)相结合。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验