• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农田中杂交杨树河岸缓冲带、草本河岸缓冲带和天然河岸林地的根系生物量与土壤碳分布

Root biomass and soil carbon distribution in hybrid poplar riparian buffers, herbaceous riparian buffers and natural riparian woodlots on farmland.

作者信息

Fortier Julien, Truax Benoit, Gagnon Daniel, Lambert France

机构信息

Fiducie de recherche sur la forêt des Cantons-de-l'Est / Eastern Townships Forest Research Trust, 1 rue Principale, J0B 2M0 Saint-Benoît-du-Lac, QC Canada ; Département des sciences biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, C.P. 8888, H3C 3P8 succ. Centre-ville, Montréal, QC Canada.

出版信息

Springerplus. 2013 Oct 17;2:539. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-539. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1186/2193-1801-2-539
PMID:24255839
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3825063/
Abstract

The objectives of this study were to compare coarse root (diameter > 2 mm) and fine root (diameter < 2 mm) biomass, as well as distribution of soil carbon stocks in 3 types of riparian land uses across 4 sites located in farmland of southern Québec, Canada: (1) hybrid poplar buffers (9th growing season); (2) herbaceous buffers; (3) natural woodlots (varying in tree species and age). For all land uses most of the root biomass was within the 0-20 cm depth range. Total coarse root biomass, to a 60 cm depth, ranged from 8.8-73.7 t/ha in woodlots, 0.6-1.3 t/ha in herbaceous buffers, and 9.2-27.3 t/ha in poplars. Total fine root biomass ranged from 2.68-8.64 t/ha in woodlots, 2.60-3.29 t/ha in herbaceous buffers, and 1.86-2.62 t/ha in poplars. Total root biomass was similar or higher in poplar buffers compared to a 27 year-old grey birch forest. This indicates that poplar buffers accelerated riparian soil colonisation by roots compared to natural secondary succession. Generally, fine root biomass in the surface soil (0-20 cm) was lower in poplar than in herbaceous buffers; the reverse was observed at greater depth. Highest coarse root biomass in the 40-60 cm depth range was observed in a poplar buffer, highlighting the deep rooted nature of poplars. On average, total soil C stocks (0-60 cm) were greater in woodlots than in riparian buffers. On most sites, soil C stocks tended to be lower in poplar buffers compared to adjacent herbaceous buffers, especially in surface soil, probably because of lower fine root biomass in poplar buffers. Across all sites and land uses, highest soil C stocks at the different soil depths were found in the soil layers of woodlots that also had the greatest fine root biomass. Strong positive linear relationships between fine root biomass and soil C stocks in the 0-20 cm depth range (R (2) = 0.79, p < 0.001), and in the whole soil profile (0-60 cm) (R (2) = 0.65, p < 0.01), highlight the central role of fine root biomass in maintaining or increasing soil C stocks.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较粗根(直径>2毫米)和细根(直径<2毫米)生物量,以及加拿大魁北克省南部农田中4个地点3种河岸土地利用类型的土壤碳储量分布:(1)杂交杨树缓冲带(第9个生长季);(2)草本缓冲带;(3)天然林地(树种和树龄各异)。对于所有土地利用类型,大部分根系生物量都在0-20厘米深度范围内。到60厘米深度,天然林地的粗根总生物量为8.8-73.7吨/公顷,草本缓冲带为0.6-1.3吨/公顷,杨树为9.2-27.3吨/公顷。细根总生物量在天然林地为2.68-8.64吨/公顷,草本缓冲带为2.60-3.29吨/公顷,杨树为1.86-2.62吨/公顷。与一片27年树龄的灰桦林相比,杨树缓冲带的总根系生物量相似或更高。这表明与天然次生演替相比,杨树缓冲带加速了河岸土壤的根系定殖。一般来说,杨树地表土壤(0-20厘米)中的细根生物量低于草本缓冲带;在更深的深度则观察到相反的情况。在一个杨树缓冲带中,40-60厘米深度范围内的粗根生物量最高,突出了杨树根系深扎的特性。平均而言,天然林地的土壤总碳储量(0-60厘米)大于河岸缓冲带。在大多数地点,与相邻的草本缓冲带相比,杨树缓冲带的土壤碳储量往往较低,尤其是在表层土壤中,这可能是因为杨树缓冲带中的细根生物量较低。在所有地点和土地利用类型中,不同土壤深度的最高土壤碳储量出现在细根生物量也最大的天然林地土壤层中。0-20厘米深度范围内细根生物量与土壤碳储量之间(R(2)=0.79,p<0.001)以及整个土壤剖面(0-60厘米)之间(R(2)=0.65,p<0.01)存在强烈的正线性关系,突出了细根生物量在维持或增加土壤碳储量中的核心作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/4c0b852a0380/40064_2013_607_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/68ee55042c99/40064_2013_607_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/4a9d0b377792/40064_2013_607_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/609fcfc47971/40064_2013_607_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/1dd91ff6c1fa/40064_2013_607_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/aa7ea5c8f1d0/40064_2013_607_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/a5c6ad7570ad/40064_2013_607_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/c4a823ba4c57/40064_2013_607_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/13db1d7b5724/40064_2013_607_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/6ff9865d7e37/40064_2013_607_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/2fc45ff625b2/40064_2013_607_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/4c0b852a0380/40064_2013_607_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/68ee55042c99/40064_2013_607_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/4a9d0b377792/40064_2013_607_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/609fcfc47971/40064_2013_607_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/1dd91ff6c1fa/40064_2013_607_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/aa7ea5c8f1d0/40064_2013_607_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/a5c6ad7570ad/40064_2013_607_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/c4a823ba4c57/40064_2013_607_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/13db1d7b5724/40064_2013_607_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/6ff9865d7e37/40064_2013_607_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/2fc45ff625b2/40064_2013_607_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c395/3825063/4c0b852a0380/40064_2013_607_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Root biomass and soil carbon distribution in hybrid poplar riparian buffers, herbaceous riparian buffers and natural riparian woodlots on farmland.农田中杂交杨树河岸缓冲带、草本河岸缓冲带和天然河岸林地的根系生物量与土壤碳分布
Springerplus. 2013 Oct 17;2:539. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-539. eCollection 2013.
2
Biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stocks in hybrid poplar buffers, herbaceous buffers and natural woodlots in the riparian zone on agricultural land.农田河岸带杂交杨树缓冲带、草本缓冲带和天然林地中的生物量碳、氮和磷储量。
J Environ Manage. 2015 May 1;154:333-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.02.039. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
3
Biomass Production and Carbon Stocks in Poplar-Crop Agroforestry Chronosequence in Subtropical Central China.中国亚热带中部杨树-农作物农林复合系统时间序列中的生物量生产与碳储量
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;12(13):2451. doi: 10.3390/plants12132451.
4
Vertical distribution of soil extractable organic C and N contents and total C and N stocks in 78-year-old tree plantations in subtropical Australia.78 年生人工林土壤可提取有机碳和氮含量及总碳和氮储量的垂直分布特征。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Oct;24(28):22312-22320. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9900-x. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
5
Impact of progressive and retrogressive land use changes on ecosystem multifunctionality: Implications for land restoration in the Indian Eastern Himalayan region.土地利用时空变化对生态系统多功能性的影响:对印度东喜马拉雅地区土地恢复的启示。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169197. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169197. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
6
Quantification of two-year-old hybrid poplar root systems: morphology, biomass, and (14)C distribution.两年生杂交杨树根系的量化:形态、生物量及¹⁴C分布
Tree Physiol. 1991 Mar;8(2):109-19. doi: 10.1093/treephys/8.2.109.
7
Allocation pattern and accumulation potential of carbon stock in natural spruce forests in northwest China.中国西北天然云杉林碳储量的分配格局与积累潜力
PeerJ. 2018 May 25;6:e4859. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4859. eCollection 2018.
8
First assessment of root biomass and root carbon and nitrogen stocks in Turkish floodplain forests.土耳其洪泛林根系生物量和根系碳氮储量的首次评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Nov 25;195(1):148. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10758-6.
9
Fine root biomass and turnover of two fast-growing poplar genotypes in a short-rotation coppice culture.短轮伐期萌生林栽培中两种速生杨树基因型的细根生物量与周转
Plant Soil. 2013;373(1-2):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1778-x. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
10
Relationship between genotype and soil environment during colonization of poplar roots by mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi.菌根和内生真菌定殖杨树根过程中基因型与土壤环境的关系。
Mycorrhiza. 2010 Jun;20(5):315-24. doi: 10.1007/s00572-009-0284-8. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Root Functional Trait and Soil Microbial Coordination: Implications for Soil Respiration in Riparian Agroecosystems.根系功能性状与土壤微生物协同作用:对河岸农业生态系统土壤呼吸的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 8;12:681113. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.681113. eCollection 2021.
2
Effects of habitat types on the dynamic changes in allocation in carbon and nitrogen storage of vegetation-soil system in sandy grasslands: How habitat types affect C and N allocation?栖息地类型对沙地草原植被-土壤系统碳氮储量分配动态变化的影响:栖息地类型如何影响碳氮分配?
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun 5;11(13):9079-9091. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7751. eCollection 2021 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Soil C and N changes with afforestation of grasslands across gradients of precipitation and plantation age.土壤碳氮随降水梯度和造林年龄变化而变化的草原造林。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Jan;22(1):76-86. doi: 10.1890/10-2210.1.
2
Biomass production and carbon sequestration potential in poplar plantations with different management patterns.不同管理模式杨树人工林的生物量生产和碳固存潜力
J Environ Manage. 2007 Nov;85(3):672-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.09.014. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
3
The strategy of ecosystem development.生态系统发展战略。
Science. 1969 Apr 18;164(3877):262-70. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3877.262.