Rowan Paul J
Paul J Rowan, Division of Management, Policy, and Community Health, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
World J Virol. 2013 Nov 12;2(4):139-45. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v2.i4.139.
Depression is often a side effect of interferon-alpha treatment for hepatitis C, and is recognized as a cause for treatment discontinuation. When detected, antidepressant treatment begins promptly. In contrast to this rescue approach, prophylactic antidepressant treatment has been considered as a superior approach. While studies indicate that depression is lower with prophylaxis, no study has prospectively evaluated the degree that treatment completion might be boosted by the prophylactic strategy. A structured literature search was conducted to discover all trials of antidepressant prophylaxis for patients undergoing antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Selection criteria included: antidepressant prophylaxis study; report of depression treatment outcome; report of numbers discontinuing and reason for discontinuation (including any of the following: discontinuation data for medical side effects (i.e., thrombocytopenia); discontinuation due to lack of antiviral response; discontinuation due to lack of antidepressant effect; discontinuation due to antidepressant side effects; discontinuation due to patient preference; discontinuation due to loss to follow-up; or unspecified discontinuation). Across the studies, total enrollees were determined for the prophylaxis arms and the rescue arms, and then, again across studies, those discontinuing for reasons other than lack of antiviral response or medical side effect were summed for each of these two arms. Twelve studies were discovered. One was a retrospective chart review, one was an uncontrolled trial, and ten were controlled trials. Discontinuation of antiviral therapy was not less common in the prophylaxis arms: of the 396 patients treated by the prophylaxis strategy, 47 (11.9%) discontinued; of the 380 patients in the rescue strategy, 45 (11.8%) discontinued. While the prophylaxis strategy seems to manage depression symptoms, it does not seem to boost treatment completion. Rescue was a very successful strategy when indicated. While antidepressant prophylaxis has benefit in antiviral treatment, it should not generally be valued for boosting the likelihood of treatment completion.
抑郁症常常是丙型肝炎患者接受α-干扰素治疗的副作用,并且被认为是导致治疗中断的一个原因。一旦确诊,会立即开始抗抑郁治疗。与这种补救方法不同,预防性抗抑郁治疗被认为是一种更优的方法。虽然研究表明预防性治疗时抑郁症的发生率较低,但尚无研究前瞻性评估预防性策略能在多大程度上提高治疗完成率。我们进行了一项系统性文献检索,以找出所有针对接受慢性丙型肝炎抗病毒治疗患者的抗抑郁预防性试验。入选标准包括:抗抑郁预防性研究;抑郁症治疗结果报告;停药人数及停药原因报告(包括以下任何一项:因药物副作用停药(如血小板减少);因抗病毒治疗无反应停药;因抗抑郁治疗无效停药;因抗抑郁药物副作用停药;因患者偏好停药;因失访停药;或未明确原因的停药)。在各项研究中,确定了预防性治疗组和补救治疗组的总入组人数,然后再次在各项研究中,将这两组中因抗病毒治疗无反应或药物副作用以外的原因停药的人数相加。共发现12项研究。1项为回顾性病历审查,1项为非对照试验,10项为对照试验。抗病毒治疗的中断在预防性治疗组中并不少见:采用预防性策略治疗的396例患者中,47例(11.9%)停药;采用补救策略的380例患者中,45例(11.8%)停药。虽然预防性策略似乎能控制抑郁症状,但似乎并不能提高治疗完成率。当有指征时,补救治疗是一种非常成功的策略。虽然抗抑郁预防性治疗在抗病毒治疗中有益处,但一般不应因其能提高治疗完成的可能性而受到重视。