Gans Itai, Baldwin Keith D, Ganley Theodore J
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):1743-50. doi: 10.1177/0363546513508538. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
Tibial eminence fractures are rare but occur more frequently in children and adolescents. There are a variety of methods to surgically treat these fractures, but surgeons disagree about the optimal method of reduction and fixation.
Regarding clinical results and complications after treatment in children and adolescent patients with tibial eminence fractures, the authors hypothesize that (1) there is no difference between reduction and fixation with screws versus sutures, (2) there is no difference in arthroscopic versus open reduction and fixation, and (3) outcomes are better in patients with minimally displaced (types I and II) versus completely displaced (types III and IV) fractures.
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
A systematic review of the literature was performed studying the treatment of tibial eminence fractures in children and adolescents to determine clinical results, functional outcomes, and complications. A meta-analytic technique on observational studies was used to compare outcomes when sufficient data were available.
The review identified 26 articles with extractable clinical results and data on complications: 1 level 3 article and 25 level 4 articles. Ten of 580 tibial eminence fractures identified in the literature had nonunion, with 60% of nonunions occurring in type III fractures treated by nonoperative modalities. Appreciable healing was noted for both open and arthroscopic fixation techniques as well as patients treated by screw or suture fixation. Laxity (P < .001) and loss of range of motion (P = .009) occurred significantly less after the treatment of minimally displaced fractures (types I and II).
The level of evidence supporting various treatments of tibial eminence fractures in children and adolescents is low. There is insufficient evidence to conclude the superiority of open versus arthroscopic fixation or screw versus suture fixation techniques. Nonoperative treatment of completely displaced tibial eminence fractures results in higher rates of nonunion. Type III and IV fractures heal with greater laxity and greater loss of range of motion after treatment. Higher level studies are necessary to determine the optimal method of fixation for tibial eminence fractures.
胫骨髁间棘骨折较为罕见,但在儿童和青少年中更为常见。手术治疗这些骨折有多种方法,但外科医生对于复位和固定的最佳方法存在分歧。
关于儿童和青少年胫骨髁间棘骨折治疗后的临床结果和并发症,作者假设:(1)螺钉固定与缝线固定在复位和固定方面无差异;(2)关节镜下复位固定与切开复位固定无差异;(3)轻度移位(I型和II型)骨折患者的治疗结果优于完全移位(III型和IV型)骨折患者。
系统评价;证据等级,4级。
对文献进行系统评价,研究儿童和青少年胫骨髁间棘骨折的治疗方法,以确定临床结果、功能结局和并发症。当有足够数据时,采用观察性研究的荟萃分析技术比较结局。
该评价共纳入26篇具有可提取临床结果和并发症数据的文章:1篇3级文章和25篇4级文章。文献中580例胫骨髁间棘骨折中有10例出现骨不连,其中60%的骨不连发生在采用非手术方式治疗的III型骨折中。开放固定技术、关节镜固定技术以及采用螺钉或缝线固定治疗的患者均有明显愈合。轻度移位骨折(I型和II型)治疗后,松弛(P <.001)和活动范围丧失(P =.009)的发生率显著降低。
支持儿童和青少年胫骨髁间棘骨折各种治疗方法的证据水平较低。没有足够的证据得出切开复位固定与关节镜固定或螺钉固定与缝线固定技术优越性的结论。完全移位的胫骨髁间棘骨折采用非手术治疗会导致更高的骨不连发生率。III型和IV型骨折治疗后愈合时松弛度更大,活动范围丧失更多。需要更高水平的研究来确定胫骨髁间棘骨折的最佳固定方法。