Suppr超能文献

用拉罗尼酶(阿糖苷酶α(商品名:Aldurazyme(®)))进行酶替代疗法治疗I型黏多糖贮积症。

Enzyme replacement therapy with laronidase (Aldurazyme(®)) for treating mucopolysaccharidosis type I.

作者信息

Jameson Elisabeth, Jones Simon, Wraith James E

机构信息

Willink Biochemical Genetics Unit, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, St Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK, M13 9WL.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 21(11):CD009354. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009354.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mucopolysaccharidosis type I can be classified as three clinical sub-types; Hurler syndrome, Hurler-Scheie syndrome and Scheie syndrome, with the scale of severity being such that Hurler syndrome is the most severe and Scheie syndrome the least severe. It is a rare, autosomal recessive disorder caused by a deficiency of alpha-L-iduronidase. Deficiency of this enzyme results in the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans within the tissues. The clinical manifestations are facial dysmorphism, hepatosplenomegaly, upper airway obstruction, skeletal deformity and cardiomyopathy. If Hurler syndrome is left untreated, death ensues by adolescence. There are more attenuated variants termed Hurler-Scheie or Scheie syndrome, with those affected potentially not presenting until adulthood. Enzyme replacement therapy has been used for a number of years in the treatment of Hurler syndrome, although the current gold standard would be a haemopoietic stem cell transplant in those diagnosed by 2.5 years of age.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treating mucopolysaccharidosis type I with laronidase enzyme replacement therapy as compared to placebo.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register, MEDLINE via OVID and EMBASE.Date of most recent search: 08 February 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of laronidase enzyme replacement therapy compared to placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened the identified trials. The authors then appraised and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

One study of 45 patients met the inclusion criteria. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multinational trial looked at laronidase at a dose of 0.58 mg/kg/week versus placebo in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I. All primary outcomes listed in this review were studied in this trial. The laronidase group achieved statistically significant improvements in per cent predicted forced vital capacity compared to placebo, MD 5.60 (95% confidence intervals 1.24 to 9.96) and in the six-minute-walk test (mean improvement of 38.1 metres in the laronidase group; P = 0.039, when using a prospectively planned analysis of covariance). The levels of urinary glycoaminoglycans were also significantly reduced. In addition, there were improvements in hepatomegaly, sleep apnoea and hypopnoea. Laronidase antibodies were detected in nearly all patients in the treatment group with no apparent clinical effect and titres were reducing by the end of the study. Infusion-related adverse reactions occurred in both groups but all were mild and none necessitated medical intervention or infusion cessation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence demonstrates that laronidase is effective when compared to placebo in the treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type I. The included trial was comprehensive and of good quality, although there were few participants. The trial included all of the key outcome measures we wished to look at. It demonstrated that laronidase is efficacious in relation to reducing biochemical parameters (reduced urine glycosaminoglycan excretion) and improved functional capacity as assessed by forced vital capacity and the six-minute-walk test. In addition glycosaminoglycan storage was reduced as ascertained by a reduction in liver volume. Laronidase appeared to be safe and, while antibodies were generated, these titres were reducing by the end of the study. More studies are required to determine long-term effectiveness and safety and to assess the impact upon quality of life. Enzyme replacement therapy with laronidase can be used pre- and peri-haemopoietic stem cell transplant, which is now the gold standard treatment in those patients diagnosed under 2.5 years of age.

摘要

背景

I型粘多糖贮积症可分为三种临床亚型:Hurler综合征、Hurler-Scheie综合征和Scheie综合征,严重程度依次递减,其中Hurler综合征最为严重,Scheie综合征最轻微。它是一种罕见的常染色体隐性疾病,由α-L-艾杜糖醛酸酶缺乏引起。该酶缺乏导致组织内糖胺聚糖蓄积。临床表现为面部畸形、肝脾肿大、上呼吸道梗阻、骨骼畸形和心肌病。若Hurler综合征不治疗,患者在青春期前就会死亡。还有一些症状较轻的变异型,称为Hurler-Scheie或Scheie综合征,患者可能直到成年才出现症状。多年来一直使用酶替代疗法治疗Hurler综合征,不过目前的金标准是对2.5岁前确诊的患者进行造血干细胞移植。

目的

评估与安慰剂相比,用拉罗尼酶进行酶替代疗法治疗I型粘多糖贮积症的有效性和安全性。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane囊性纤维化和遗传疾病组的先天性代谢缺陷试验注册库、通过OVID检索的MEDLINE以及EMBASE。最近一次检索日期:2013年2月8日。

入选标准

拉罗尼酶酶替代疗法与安慰剂对比的随机和半随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两位作者独立筛选了所识别的试验。然后作者们评估并提取数据。

主要结果

一项纳入45例患者的研究符合纳入标准。这项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、多中心试验比较了拉罗尼酶(剂量为0.58 mg/kg/周)与安慰剂用于I型粘多糖贮积症患者的疗效。本综述中列出的所有主要结局指标均在该试验中进行了研究。与安慰剂相比,拉罗尼酶组在预计用力肺活量百分比方面取得了具有统计学意义的改善,MD为5.60(95%置信区间为1.24至9.96),在六分钟步行试验中也有改善(拉罗尼酶组平均改善38.1米;采用前瞻性计划的协方差分析时,P = 0.039)。尿糖胺聚糖水平也显著降低。此外,肝肿大、睡眠呼吸暂停和呼吸浅慢也有改善。治疗组几乎所有患者均检测到拉罗尼酶抗体,但无明显临床效应,且到研究结束时抗体滴度在下降。两组均发生了与输液相关的不良反应,但均较轻微,无一例需要药物干预或停止输液。

作者结论

目前的证据表明,与安慰剂相比,拉罗尼酶治疗I型粘多糖贮积症有效。纳入的试验全面且质量良好,尽管参与者较少。该试验纳入了我们希望观察的所有关键结局指标。它表明,拉罗尼酶在降低生化指标(减少尿糖胺聚糖排泄)以及通过用力肺活量和六分钟步行试验评估的功能能力改善方面是有效的。此外,通过肝脏体积减小确定糖胺聚糖蓄积减少。拉罗尼酶似乎是安全的,虽然产生了抗体,但到研究结束时这些抗体滴度在下降。需要更多研究来确定其长期有效性和安全性,并评估对生活质量的影响。拉罗尼酶酶替代疗法可在造血干细胞移植前及移植期间使用,造血干细胞移植目前是2.5岁前确诊患者的金标准治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验