Shoulders Bethany R, Franks Andrea S, Barlow Patrick B, Williams Juli D, Farland Michelle Z
University of Tennessee Health Science Center College of Pharmacy, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Jan;48(1):54-61. doi: 10.1177/1060028013511323. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
On June 8, 2011, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported safety concerns regarding statin-related myopathies and advised further restrictions on simvastatin dosing. These restrictions reduced the maximum dose for specific patient characteristics, primarily certain concomitant medications.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 2 different pharmacist-conducted educational interventions on appropriate simvastatin use in the primary care setting.
This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted in 2 academic medical center clinics. Patients prescribed simvastatin before June 8, 2011, requiring dosage adjustment based on labeling changes were evaluated for study inclusion. The pharmacists' interventions included: 30-minute didactic session for prescribers or patient-specific recommendation communicated with the physician during the patient's follow-up visit. Primary outcomes were the number of patients prescribed FDA-recommended simvastatin doses after pharmacist intervention and the intervention's impact on low-density lipoprotein (LDL).
Medical record review identified 1173 patients prescribed simvastatin prior to June 8, 2011; 126 patients qualified for study inclusion. After controlling for baseline characteristics, the likelihood of patients being prescribed an appropriate dose postintervention increased if they were in the patient-specific recommendation group (odds ratio [OR] = 10.59; 95% CI = 3.43-32.69; P < .0001). LDL change occurred at a similar rate between intervention groups (P = .652).
Following FDA labeling changes for simvastatin, patient-specific recommendations made by pharmacists correlated with a greater likelihood of appropriate simvastatin dosing compared with a one-time didactic education session. Patient-specific recommendations positively affect prescribing habits and making steps to improve patient safety.
2011年6月8日,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)报告了与他汀类药物相关肌病的安全性问题,并建议进一步限制辛伐他汀的剂量。这些限制降低了特定患者特征(主要是某些合并用药)的最大剂量。
本研究的目的是比较两种不同的由药剂师实施的教育干预措施在基层医疗环境中对辛伐他汀合理使用的有效性。
本回顾性队列分析在2家学术医疗中心诊所进行。对2011年6月8日前开具辛伐他汀且需根据标签变化调整剂量的患者进行评估以确定是否纳入研究。药剂师的干预措施包括:为开处方者提供30分钟的教学课程,或在患者随访期间与医生沟通针对患者的具体建议。主要结局是药剂师干预后开具FDA推荐剂量辛伐他汀的患者数量以及干预对低密度脂蛋白(LDL)的影响。
病历审查确定了2011年6月8日前开具辛伐他汀的1173例患者;126例患者符合研究纳入标准。在控制基线特征后,如果患者属于针对患者的具体建议组,干预后开具适当剂量的可能性增加(优势比[OR]=10.59;95%置信区间[CI]=3.43 - 32.69;P<.0001)。干预组之间LDL变化率相似(P = 0.652)。
在FDA对辛伐他汀标签进行更改后,与一次性教学教育课程相比,药剂师提供的针对患者的具体建议与更有可能合理开具辛伐他汀剂量相关。针对患者的具体建议对处方习惯有积极影响,并有助于采取措施提高患者安全性。