Gustke Kenneth A, Golladay Gregory J, Roche Martin W, Elson Leah C, Anderson Christopher R
Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):955-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
Recently, technological advances have made it possible to quantify pounds of pressure across the bearing surface during TKA. This multicenter evaluation, using intraoperative sensors, was performed for two reasons: 1) to define "balance" 2) to determine if patients with balanced knees exhibit improved short-term clinical outcomes. Outcomes scores were compared between "balanced" and "unbalanced" patients. At 6-months, the balanced cohort scored 172.4 and 14.5 in KSS and WOMAC, respectively; the unbalanced cohort scored 145.3 and 23.8 in KSS and WOMAC (P < 0.001). Out of all confounding variables, balanced joints were the most significant contributing factor to improved postoperative outcomes (P < 0.001). Odds ratios demonstrate that balanced joints are 2.5, 1.3, and 1.8 times more likely to achieve meaningful improvement in KSS, WOMAC, and activity level, respectively.
最近,技术进步使得在全膝关节置换术(TKA)期间能够量化轴承表面上的压力磅数。这项使用术中传感器的多中心评估有两个原因:1)定义“平衡”;2)确定膝关节平衡的患者是否表现出更好的短期临床结果。对“平衡”和“不平衡”患者的结果评分进行了比较。在6个月时,平衡组在膝关节协会评分系统(KSS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)中的得分分别为172.4和14.5;不平衡组在KSS和WOMAC中的得分分别为145.3和23.8(P < 0.001)。在所有混杂变量中,平衡的关节是术后结果改善的最主要因素(P < 0.001)。优势比表明,平衡的关节在KSS、WOMAC和活动水平上实现有意义改善的可能性分别高出2.5倍、1.3倍和1.8倍。