Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
Skeletal Radiol. 2014 Feb;43(2):165-8. doi: 10.1007/s00256-013-1757-6. Epub 2013 Nov 24.
Percutaneous synovial biopsy has recently been reported to have a high diagnostic value in the preoperative identification of periprosthetic infection of the hip. We report our experience with this technique in the evaluation of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty, comparing results of preoperative synovial biopsy with joint aspiration in identifying an infected hip arthroplasty by bacteriological analysis.
We retrospectively reviewed the results of the 110 most recent revision hip arthroplasties in which preoperative synovial biopsy and joint aspiration were both performed. Revision surgery for these patients occurred during the period from September 2005 to March 2012. Using this study group, results from preoperative cultures were compared with preoperative laboratory studies and the results of intraoperative cultures. Synovial aspiration was done using an 18- or 20-gauge spinal needle. Synovial biopsy was done coaxially following aspiration using a 22-gauge Chiba needle or 21-gauge Sure-Cut needle. Standard microbiological analysis was performed on preoperative synovial fluid aspirate and synovial biopsy. Intraoperative tissue biopsy bacteriological analysis results at surgical revision were accepted as the "gold standard" for the presence or absence of infection.
Seventeen of 110 (15 %) of patients had intraoperative culture-positive periprosthetic infection. Of these 17 cases, there were ten cases where either the synovial fluid aspiration and/or the synovial biopsy were true positive (sensitivity of 59 %, specificity of 100 %, positive predictive value of 100 % and accuracy of 94 %). There were seven cases where aspiration and biopsy results were both falsely negative, but no false-positive results. Similar results were found for synovial fluid aspiration alone. The results of synovial biopsy alone resulted in the identification of seven infected joints with no false-positive result (sensitivity of 41 %, specificity of 100 %, positive predictive value of 100 %, and accuracy of 91 %).
Standard microbiological analyses performed on percutaneous synovial biopsy specimen during the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty did not improve detection of culture-positive periprosthetic infection as compared to synovial fluid aspiration alone.
经皮滑膜活检术最近被报道在术前诊断髋关节假体周围感染方面具有很高的诊断价值。我们报告了我们在评估接受髋关节翻修术的患者时使用该技术的经验,比较了术前滑膜活检和关节抽吸术在通过细菌学分析识别感染性髋关节置换术方面的结果。
我们回顾性分析了最近 110 例接受髋关节翻修术的患者的结果,这些患者均同时进行了术前滑膜活检和关节抽吸术。这些患者的翻修手术发生在 2005 年 9 月至 2012 年 3 月期间。使用本研究组,将术前培养物的结果与术前实验室研究和术中培养物的结果进行比较。滑膜抽吸术使用 18 或 20 号脊柱针进行。在抽吸后,使用 22 号 Chiba 针或 21 号 Sure-Cut 针同轴进行滑膜活检。对术前滑膜液抽吸和滑膜活检进行标准微生物分析。手术翻修时的术中组织活检细菌学分析结果被接受为感染存在与否的“金标准”。
110 例患者中有 17 例(15%)术中培养出假体周围感染。在这 17 例中,滑膜液抽吸和/或滑膜活检中有 10 例为真阳性(敏感性为 59%,特异性为 100%,阳性预测值为 100%,准确性为 94%)。有 7 例抽吸和活检结果均为假阴性,但无假阳性结果。单独进行滑膜液抽吸也得到了类似的结果。单独进行滑膜活检可识别出 7 个感染关节,无假阳性结果(敏感性为 41%,特异性为 100%,阳性预测值为 100%,准确性为 91%)。
与单独进行滑膜液抽吸相比,在髋关节翻修术患者术前评估时进行标准微生物分析不能提高对培养阳性假体周围感染的检出率。