MBA, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania, 1800 Lombard St, Philadelphia, PA 19146 USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2013 Dec;32(12):2091-8. doi: 10.7863/ultra.32.12.2091.
To study relationships between median wrist and forearm sonographic measurements and median nerve conduction studies.
The study population consisted of a prospective convenience sample of healthy adults. Interventions included high-resolution median nerve sonography and median motor and sensory nerve conduction studies. Main outcome measures included median motor nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude, distal latency, and conduction velocity; sensory nerve action potential amplitude and distal latency; and sonographic median nerve cross-sectional area. Median motor nerve and sensory nerve conduction studies of the index finger were performed using standard published techniques. A second examiner blinded to nerve conduction study results used a high-frequency linear array transducer to measure the cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the distal volar wrist crease (carpal tunnel inlet) and forearm (4 cm proximally), measured in the transverse plane on static sonograms. The outer margin of the median nerve was traced at the junction of the hypoechoic fascicles and adjacent outer connective tissue layer.
Fifty median nerves were evaluated in 25 participants. The compound muscle action potential amplitude with wrist stimulation was positively related to the cross-sectional area, with the area increasing by 0.195 mm(2) for every millivolt increase in amplitude in the dominant hand (95% confidence interval, 0.020, 0.370 mm(2); P < .05) and 0.247 mm(2) in the nondominant hand (95% confidence interval, 0.035, 0.459 mm(2); P < .05). There was no significant linear association between the wrist median cross-sectional area and median motor and sensory distal latencies. Conduction velocity through the forearm was not significantly linearly associated with the forearm area or forearm-to-wrist area ratio (tapering ratio). The wrist area was inversely related to the sensory nerve action potential amplitude.
Although associations were found between median nerve conduction study amplitudes and sonographic nerve measurements, they were not found for other parameters. Studying these relationships may increase our understanding of when to best use these procedures.
研究腕中和前臂超声测量值与正中神经传导研究之间的关系。
研究人群由一组前瞻性便利的健康成年人组成。干预措施包括高分辨率正中神经超声检查以及正中运动和感觉神经传导研究。主要观察指标包括正中运动神经复合肌肉动作电位幅度、远端潜伏期和传导速度;感觉神经动作电位幅度和远端潜伏期;以及超声正中神经横截面积。使用标准公布的技术对食指的正中运动神经和感觉神经传导研究进行检测。第二位检查者在不了解神经传导研究结果的情况下,使用高频线性阵列换能器在静态超声图像的横断面上测量远端掌侧腕皱褶(腕管入口)和前臂(距近端 4 厘米处)的正中神经横截面积。正中神经的外边缘在低回声束的交界处和相邻的外结缔组织层进行追踪。
在 25 名参与者中评估了 50 条正中神经。腕部刺激时复合肌肉动作电位幅度与横截面积呈正相关,在优势手时,幅度每增加 1 毫伏,横截面积增加 0.195 平方毫米(95%置信区间,0.020,0.370 平方毫米;P <.05),非优势手增加 0.247 平方毫米(95%置信区间,0.035,0.459 平方毫米;P <.05)。腕部正中神经横截面积与正中运动和感觉神经远端潜伏期之间没有显著的线性关系。前臂的传导速度与前臂面积或前臂到腕部面积比(变细比)没有显著的线性关联。腕部面积与感觉神经动作电位幅度呈负相关。
虽然发现正中神经传导研究幅度与超声神经测量值之间存在关联,但其他参数之间没有关联。研究这些关系可以增加我们对何时最佳使用这些程序的理解。