Rössler W, Ajdacic-Gross V, Haker H, Rodgers S, Müller M, Hengartner M P
University Hospital of Psychiatry,Zurich Programme for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services, Zurich,Switzerland.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2015 Feb;24(1):69-77. doi: 10.1017/S2045796013000681. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
Aims. Prevalence and covariates of subclinical psychosis have gained increased interest in the context of early identification and treatment of persons at risk for psychosis. Methods. We analysed 9829 adults representative of the general population within the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Two psychosis syndromes, derived from the SCL-90-R, were applied: 'schizotypal signs' and 'schizophrenia nuclear symptoms'. Results. Only a few subjects (13.2%) reported no schizotypal signs. While 33.2% of subjects indicated mild signs, only a small proportion (3.7%) reported severe signs. A very common outcome was no 'schizophrenia nuclear symptoms' (70.6%). Although 13.5% of the participants reported mild symptoms, severe nuclear symptoms were very rare (0.5%). Because these two syndromes were only moderately correlated (r = 0.43), we were able to establish sufficiently distinct symptom clusters. Schizotypal signs were more closely connected to distress than was schizophrenia nuclear symptoms, even though their distribution types were similar. Both syndromes were associated with several covariates, such as alcohol and tobacco use, being unmarried, low education level, psychopathological distress and low subjective well-being. Conclusions. Subclinical psychosis symptoms are quite frequent in the general population but, for the most part, are not very pronounced. In particular, our data support the notion of a continuous Wald distribution of psychotic symptoms in the general population. Our findings have enabled us to confirm the usefulness of these syndromes as previously assessed in other independent community samples. Both can appropriately be associated with well-known risk factors of schizophrenia.
目的。在对有精神病风险的人群进行早期识别和治疗的背景下,亚临床精神病的患病率及相关因素越来越受到关注。方法。我们分析了瑞士苏黎世州具有一般人群代表性的9829名成年人。应用了源自症状自评量表(SCL - 90 - R)的两种精神病综合征:“分裂样症状”和“精神分裂症核心症状”。结果。只有少数受试者(13.2%)报告无分裂样症状。33.2%的受试者有轻度症状,只有一小部分(3.7%)报告有重度症状。一个非常常见的结果是没有“精神分裂症核心症状”(70.6%)。虽然13.5%的参与者报告有轻度症状,但重度核心症状非常罕见(0.5%)。由于这两种综合征的相关性仅为中等程度(r = 0.43),我们能够建立足够不同的症状集群。即使它们的分布类型相似,但分裂样症状比精神分裂症核心症状与痛苦的联系更紧密。两种综合征都与几个相关因素有关,如饮酒和吸烟、未婚、低教育水平、精神病理痛苦和低主观幸福感。结论。亚临床精神病症状在一般人群中相当常见,但在大多数情况下并不十分明显。特别是,我们的数据支持了一般人群中精神病症状呈连续Wald分布的观点。我们的研究结果使我们能够证实这些综合征在先前其他独立社区样本中评估的有用性。两者都能适当地与精神分裂症的已知风险因素相关联。