Dr. Puchalski is professor, Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington School of Medicine, and director, George Washington Institute for Spirituality and Health, Washington, DC. Dr. Blatt is professor of medicine, and medical director, The Clinical Learning and Simulation Skills (CLASS) Center, George Washington School of Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Kogan is medical director, George Washington Center for Integrative Medicine, Washington, DC. Dr. Butler is executive director, Foundation Relations, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Acad Med. 2014 Jan;89(1):10-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000083.
Spirituality has played a role in health care for centuries, but by the early 20th century, technological advances in diagnosis and treatment overshadowed the more human element of medicine. In response, a core group of medical academics and practitioners launched a movement to reclaim medicine's spiritual roots, defining spirituality broadly as a search for meaning, purpose, and connectedness. This commentary describes the history of the field of spirituality and health-its origins, its furtherance through the Medical School Objectives Project, and its ultimate incorporation into the curricula of over 75% of U.S. medical schools. The diverse efforts in developing this field within medical education and in national and international organizations created a need for a cohesive framework. The National Competencies in Spirituality and Health-created at a consensus conference of faculty from seven medical schools and reported here for the first time-answered that need.Also reported are some of the first applications of these competencies-competency-linked curricular projects. This issue of Academic Medicine features articles from three of the participating medical schools as well as one from an additional medical school. This commentary also describes another competency application: the George Washington Institute of Spirituality and Health-Templeton Reflection Rounds initiative, known as G-TRR, which has provided clerkship students with the opportunity, through reflection on their patient encounters, to develop their own inner resources to address the suffering of others. This commentary concludes with the authors' proposals for future directions for the field.
精神医学在医疗保健领域已有数个世纪的历史,但到了 20 世纪早期,诊断和治疗方面的技术进步使医学的人性化方面黯然失色。有鉴于此,一群核心的医学学者和从业者发起了一场运动,重新挖掘医学的精神根源,将精神层面广泛地定义为对意义、目的和联系的探索。本述评描述了精神医学和健康领域的历史——它的起源、通过医学院目标项目的推进,以及最终纳入超过 75%的美国医学院课程。在医学教育以及国家和国际组织中,发展这一领域的各种努力产生了对一个凝聚力框架的需求。在一次由来自七所医学院的教师参加的共识会议上创建了国家精神医学和健康能力——本文首次报道——以满足这一需求。述评还报告了这些能力在课程项目中的一些首次应用。本期《学术医学》的特色文章来自三个参与的医学院,以及一个额外的医学院的文章。本述评还描述了另一个能力应用:乔治华盛顿精神医学和信仰研究所——坦普尔顿反思轮倡议,简称 G-TRR,它为实习学生提供了一个机会,通过反思他们与患者的接触,培养自己的内在资源,以应对他人的痛苦。述评最后提出了该领域的未来发展方向。