澳大拉西亚的毒物信息资源利用。

The utilization of poisons information resources in Australasia.

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand; Department of Information Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2014 Feb;83(2):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.10.012

PMID:24290424

Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify poisons information resources most commonly utilized by Australasian Emergency Department staff, and examine attitudes regarding the benefits and user experience of the electronic products used.

METHODS

A survey tool was mailed to six Emergency Departments each in New Zealand and Australia to be answered by medical and nursing staff.

RESULTS

Eighty six (71.7%) responses were received from the 120 survey forms sent: 70 (81%) responders were medical staff, the remainder nursing. Electronic resources were the most accessed poisons information resource in New Zealand; Australians preferring discussion with a colleague; Poisons Information Centers were the least utilized resource in both countries. With regard to electronic resources, further differences were recognized between countries in: ease of access, ease of use, quality of information and quantity of information, with New Zealand better in all four themes.

CONCLUSIONS

New Zealand ED staff favored electronic poisons information resources while Australians preferred discussion with a colleague. That Poisons Information Centers were the least utilized resource was surprising.

摘要

目的

确定澳大利亚和新西兰急诊医护人员最常使用的毒物信息资源，并考察他们对所使用电子产品的益处和用户体验的态度。

方法

向新西兰和澳大利亚的每家医院的六个急诊科室邮寄了一份调查问卷，由医务人员回答。

结果

在发出的 120 份调查问卷中，收到了 86 份（71.7%）回复：70 名（81%）应答者为医务人员，其余为护士。电子资源是新西兰最常使用的毒物信息资源；澳大利亚人更倾向于与同事讨论；毒物信息中心在两个国家都是利用率最低的资源。关于电子资源，在可访问性、易用性、信息质量和信息量方面，国家之间存在进一步的差异，新西兰在所有四个主题上都表现更好。