Suppr超能文献

HeartMate II 连续血流左心室辅助装置中的器械血栓形成:一种多因素现象。

Device thrombosis in HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a multifactorial phenomenon.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York, New York.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jan;33(1):51-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are increasingly used to support patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Device thrombosis is a serious complication of CF-LVADs, but its precise prevalence and etiology remains uncertain.

METHODS

Root-cause analysis was performed in all cases with device thrombosis confirmed upon explant among patients implanted with a HeartMate II (HM II) from January 1, 2009 to November 15, 2012. Cannula position and bend relief integrity were assessed and charts were reviewed with particular attention to anti-coagulation and infection profiles.

RESULTS

Nineteen of 177 patients (11%) were found to have device thrombosis of various etiologies after a mean of 351 ± 311 days, representing 0.12 event/patient-year. Of the 5 mechanically induced thromboses, proximate etiology was severely abnormal inflow cannula position in 3 patients and bend relief disconnect with deformed outflow graft in 2 patients. One patient had a hypercoagulable disorder with prior arterial embolism. In the remaining 13 patients (age 61 ± 14 years, 77% male, 69% Caucasian), "non-mechanical" device thrombosis occurred after 357 ± 383 days; INR at the time of diagnosis was 1.81 (1.62 to 2.07); and mean device speed was 8,855 ± 359 rpm. Five of 13 patients (38%) had an infection during the month leading up to device thrombosis. Of note, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was already elevated at the time of discharge in patients who would later develop non-mechanical device thrombosis (423 [354 to 766] vs 352 [272 to 373] U/liter, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Device thrombosis is a multifactorial phenomenon, and differentiation of mechanical and non-mechanical causes is an essential step for individual diagnosis and treatment plans. Larger studies excluding patients with obvious mechanical etiology are needed to investigate biologic and/or management-related risk factors for device thrombosis. Our findings suggest that LDH may be an early risk marker. Due to the difficulty in treating late-stage device thrombosis, we suggest early use of simple tests to rule out both causes of thrombosis, such as X-rays and closer LDH monitoring (bi-weekly).

摘要

背景

连续流动左心室辅助装置(CF-LVAD)越来越多地用于支持晚期心力衰竭(HF)患者。装置血栓形成是 CF-LVAD 的严重并发症,但确切的患病率和病因仍不确定。

方法

对 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 11 月 15 日植入 HeartMate II(HM II)的患者中,所有经证实存在装置血栓形成的患者在取出装置时进行根本原因分析。评估了导管的位置和弯曲缓解完整性,并仔细审查了图表,特别注意抗凝和感染情况。

结果

在平均 351 ± 311 天后,177 例患者中有 19 例(11%)被发现存在各种病因的装置血栓形成,相当于 0.12 例/患者年。在 5 例机械性诱导的血栓形成中,3 例患者的近端病因是严重异常的流入导管位置,2 例患者是弯曲缓解与变形的流出移植物分离。1 例患者患有高凝状态,并有先前的动脉栓塞。在其余 13 例(年龄 61 ± 14 岁,77%为男性,69%为白人)患者中,“非机械性”装置血栓形成发生在 357 ± 383 天后;诊断时的 INR 为 1.81(1.62 至 2.07);装置速度平均为 8855 ± 359 rpm。在发生非机械性装置血栓形成的患者中,有 5 例(38%)在血栓形成前的一个月内发生了感染。值得注意的是,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)在发生非机械性装置血栓形成的患者出院时已经升高(423 [354 至 766] vs 352 [272 至 373] U/L,p < 0.01)。

结论

装置血栓形成是一种多因素现象,区分机械性和非机械性原因是进行个体化诊断和治疗计划的重要步骤。需要更大的研究排除明显机械病因的患者,以研究装置血栓形成的生物学和/或管理相关危险因素。我们的研究结果表明,LDH 可能是早期的风险标志物。由于晚期装置血栓形成的治疗困难,我们建议早期使用简单的测试来排除血栓形成的两个原因,如 X 射线和更密切的 LDH 监测(每两周一次)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验