文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术后出血并发症比较:来自 PARTNER I 试验(经导管主动脉瓣置入术)的见解。

Bleeding complications after surgical aortic valve replacement compared with transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER I Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve).

机构信息

Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 25;63(11):1100-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.058. Epub 2013 Nov 27.


DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.058
PMID:24291283
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify the incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of bleeding complications (BC) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) compared with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Bleeding complications after SAVR and TAVR are frequent and may be associated with an unfavorable prognosis. METHODS: In the randomized controlled PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) I trial, 657 patients from cohort A (operable high risk) were randomly assigned to SAVR or TAVR (transfemoral [TF] if iliofemoral access was suitable or transapical [TA] if not) and received the designated treatment. First-generation Edwards SAPIEN valves and delivery systems (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) were used for TAVR, through a 22- or 24-F sheath. The 30-day rates of major BC (modified Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions), predictors of BC, and their association with 1-year mortality were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 71 (22.7%), 27 (11.3%), and 9 (8.8%) patients had major BC within 30 days of the procedure after SAVR, TF-TAVR, and TA-TAVR, respectively (p < 0.0001). SAVR was associated with a significantly higher 30-day rate of transfusion (17.9%) than either TF-TAVR (7.1%) or TA-TAVR (4.8%; p < 0.0001). Independent predictors of major BC were the occurrence of major vascular complications and use of intraprocedural hemodynamic support among TF-TAVR patients, severe procedural complications requiring conversion to open surgery among TA-TAVR patients, and the presence of low hemoglobin at baseline among SAVR patients. Major BC was identified as the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality among the full cohort. However, risk-adjusted analyses demonstrated a significant interaction between BC and treatment strategy with respect to mortality, suggesting that BC after SAVR have a greater impact on prognosis than after TAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk aortic stenosis patients enrolled in the PARTNER I randomized trial, BC were more common after SAVR than after TAVR and were also associated with a worse long-term prognosis. (THE PARTNER TRIAL: Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve Trial; NCT00530894).

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)与外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)后出血并发症(BC)的发生率、预测因素和预后影响。

背景:SAVR 和 TAVR 后 BC 较为常见,且可能与不良预后相关。

方法:在随机对照的 PARTNER(经导管主动脉瓣置换)I 试验中,A 队列(可手术的高危)的 657 名患者被随机分配至 SAVR 或 TAVR(如果适合股髂入路则采用经股动脉[TF],否则采用经心尖[TA]),并接受指定的治疗。第一代 Edwards SAPIEN 瓣膜和输送系统(爱德华生命科学公司,加利福尼亚州欧文)用于 TAVR,通过 22 或 24-F 鞘。评估 30 天内主要 BC(改良 Valve Academic Research Consortium 定义)的发生率、BC 的预测因素及其与 1 年死亡率的关系。

结果:SAVR、TF-TAVR 和 TA-TAVR 后 30 天内分别有 71 例(22.7%)、27 例(11.3%)和 9 例(8.8%)患者发生主要 BC(p<0.0001)。SAVR 与 30 天内输血率(17.9%)显著高于 TF-TAVR(7.1%)或 TA-TAVR(4.8%;p<0.0001)相关。TF-TAVR 患者中,主要 BC 的独立预测因素是主要血管并发症的发生和术中血流动力学支持的使用;TA-TAVR 患者中,需要转为开放手术的严重手术并发症以及 SAVR 患者基线时低血红蛋白是独立预测因素。在全队列中,主要 BC 是 1 年死亡率的最强独立预测因素。然而,风险调整分析显示,BC 与治疗策略之间存在显著的交互作用,表明 SAVR 后 BC 对预后的影响大于 TAVR 后。

结论:在 PARTNER I 随机试验中纳入的高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,SAVR 后 BC 比 TAVR 后更常见,且与长期预后较差相关。

相似文献

[1]
Bleeding complications after surgical aortic valve replacement compared with transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER I Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve).

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013-11-27

[2]
Sex-related differences in outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: Insights from the PARTNER Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve).

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014-2-19

[3]
Impact of preoperative moderate/severe mitral regurgitation on 2-year outcome after transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: insight from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve (PARTNER) Trial Cohort A.

Circulation. 2013-10-23

[4]
Outcomes after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comparison of the randomized PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves) trial with the NRCA (Nonrandomized Continued Access) registry.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014-11-17

[5]
Outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: results from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial (cohort A).

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013-12

[6]
Conventional surgery, sutureless valves, and transapical aortic valve replacement: what is the best option for patients with aortic valve stenosis? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013-9-8

[7]
Outcomes of patients with chronic lung disease and severe aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement or standard therapy: insights from the PARTNER trial (placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve).

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013-10-16

[8]
Transapical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: results from the nonrandomized continued access cohort of the PARTNER trial.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2013-8-20

[9]
Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015-1

[10]
Prosthesis-patient mismatch in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A randomized trial of a self-expanding prosthesis.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015-10-28

引用本文的文献

[1]
Unusual Complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Gastrointestinal Bleeding in an Elderly Patient with Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A Case Report.

Adv Biomed Res. 2025-7-21

[2]
Comparison of safety and efficacy in venous access closure using a double purse string suture technique vs. Z-suture technique after MitraClip procedure.

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025-7-25

[3]
Rationale and Design of the CREATE Trial: A Multicenter, Randomized Comparison of Continuation or Cessation of Single Antithrombotic Therapy at 1 Year After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025-4

[4]
Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

J Clin Med. 2025-2-28

[5]
Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of self-expanding and balloon-expandable valves for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI): An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025-2-24

[6]
Evaluating the Methodological Rigor and Recommendation Excellence of TAVR Guidelines: Insights from AGREE II and AGREE-REX Instruments.

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025-2-18

[7]
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.

Int J Surg. 2024-12-1

[8]
Management of Aorto-Right Ventricular Fistulas After TAVR.

JACC Case Rep. 2024-11-6

[9]
Defining high bleeding risk in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a VARC-HBR consensus document.

EuroIntervention. 2024-5-10

[10]
Modern Treatment of Valvulopathies in Patients with Congenital Hemophilia.

Life (Basel). 2024-3-7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索