CESAM, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
CESAM, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Feb 15;472:324-37. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.034. Epub 2013 Nov 30.
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has become a common methodology to evaluate the environmental performance of forest systems in recent years. This study aims to estimate the environmental profile associated with maritime pine wood production in two representative European countries: Portugal and France. Different forest management regimes based on low and high intensive conditions were evaluated and differences in logging equipment, biomass yield and lifespan were also reported. The study was completed with a sensitivity analysis based on two allocation approaches (economic and volumetric) since biomass from thinning processes is harvested and can be used as a co-product. The production of maritime pine in Portugal under low intensity conditions should present the best environmental results with reductions of 50-94% in comparison with the worst scenario. It is mainly associated with the absence of forest activities in periods previous to the logging stage. French intensive forest scenario ranks as the second best alternative of pine wood production. The remaining scenarios reported worse results in terms of environmental impacts mostly due to the remarkable repetition of a selection of those forest activities with large fuel requirement (mainly on site preparation and stand establishment and tending). Regardless of the scenario, logging related activities such as final cutting and forwarding were identified as the hotspots mainly due to the fuel requirements. Fertilizer production (if required), thinning and cleaning processes reported also remarkable contributions to the categories under assessment. In addition, an economic estimation for each forest management scenario has been performed mainly considering fuel, machinery and labor costs. According to the results, the Portuguese low intensive scenario is the best choice together with the French intensive scenario under an economic point of view because of the lowest production costs per functional unit. Activities related with the logging stage have also been identified as economic hotspots.
生命周期评估(LCA)近年来已成为评估森林系统环境性能的常用方法。本研究旨在评估两种具有代表性的欧洲国家(葡萄牙和法国)的海洋松木材生产的环境状况。评估了基于低强度和高强度条件的不同森林管理模式,并报告了采伐设备、生物量产量和寿命的差异。该研究还完成了一项基于两种分配方法(经济和体积)的敏感性分析,因为来自间伐过程的生物质被收获并可用作副产物。在低强度条件下,葡萄牙的海洋松生产应呈现出最佳的环境结果,与最差情景相比减少了 50-94%。这主要与采伐前阶段没有森林活动有关。法国的集约森林情景是生产松木材的第二佳选择。剩余的情景报告的环境影响较差,主要是由于需要大量燃料的森林活动的显著重复(主要是在场地准备、林分建立和抚育阶段)。无论情景如何,与采伐相关的活动,如最终采伐和运输,由于燃料需求,被确定为热点。肥料生产(如有需要)、间伐和清理过程也对评估类别做出了显著贡献。此外,还对每个森林管理情景进行了经济估算,主要考虑了燃料、机械和劳动力成本。根据结果,从经济角度来看,葡萄牙的低强度情景和法国的集约情景是最佳选择,因为每个功能单位的生产成本最低。与采伐阶段相关的活动也被确定为经济热点。