Sonpavde Guru, Pond Gregory R, Armstrong Andrew J, Galsky Matthew D, Leopold Lance, Wood Brian A, Wang Shaw-Ling, Paolini Jolanda, Chen Isan, Chow-Maneval Edna, Mooney David J, Lechuga Mariajose, Smith Matthew R, Michaelson M Dror
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham (UAB) Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6b):E25-E31. doi: 10.1111/bju.12589. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
To investigate the association of radiographic progression defined by Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-2 guidelines and overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Two trials that used PCWG-2 guidelines to define progression were analysed: a randomized phase II trial (n = 221) comparing first-line docetaxel-prednisone plus AT-101 or placebo, and a phase III trial (n = 873) comparing prednisone plus sunitinib or placebo after docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the association of radiographic progression with OS. Landmark analyses compared progressing patients with those who had not progressed. Sub-analyses compared patients removed from trial for progression vs other reasons.
An increased risk of death was seen for radiographic progression at landmark times from 6 to 12 months with docetaxel-based therapy (hazard ratio [HR] >1.7 at all time-points). An increased risk of death was also seen with post-docetaxel prednisone alone or with sunitinib for progression at landmark times from 2 to 8 months (HR >2.7 at all time-points). Kendall's τ was 0.50 (P < 0.001) in the setting of docetaxel-based therapy and 0.34 (P < 0.001) in the post-docetaxel setting for association between radiographic progression and death amongst patients with both events. Removal from study due to radiographic progression was associated with a significantly lower OS compared with removal for other reasons in both trials. Limitations of a retrospective analysis apply and there was no central radiology review.
Radiographic progression by PCWG-2 criteria was significantly associated with OS in patients with mCRPC receiving first-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy or post-docetaxel therapy. With external validation as a surrogate endpoint in trials showing survival benefits, the use of radiographic progression-free survival may expedite drug development in mCRPC, which has been hampered by the lack of intermediate endpoints.
探讨根据前列腺癌工作组(PCWG)-2指南定义的影像学进展与转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)男性患者总生存期(OS)之间的关联。
分析了两项采用PCWG-2指南定义进展情况的试验:一项随机II期试验(n = 221),比较一线多西他赛-泼尼松联合AT-101或安慰剂;另一项III期试验(n = 873),比较基于多西他赛化疗后泼尼松联合舒尼替尼或安慰剂。采用Cox比例风险回归模型来估计影像学进展与OS之间的关联。地标性分析比较了进展患者与未进展患者。亚组分析比较了因进展而退出试验的患者与因其他原因退出试验的患者。
在基于多西他赛治疗的6至12个月地标性时间点,影像学进展患者的死亡风险增加(所有时间点风险比[HR] >1.7)。在多西他赛治疗后单独使用泼尼松或联合舒尼替尼治疗的2至8个月地标性时间点,进展患者的死亡风险也增加(所有时间点HR >2.7)。在基于多西他赛治疗的情况下,发生影像学进展和死亡事件的患者之间,Kendall's τ为0.50(P < 0.001);在多西他赛治疗后的情况下,该值为0.34(P < 0.001)。在两项试验中,因影像学进展而退出研究与因其他原因退出研究相比,OS显著更低。本研究存在回顾性分析的局限性,且未进行中心影像学审查。
对于接受一线基于多西他赛化疗或多西他赛治疗后的mCRPC患者,根据PCWG-2标准的影像学进展与OS显著相关。在显示生存获益的试验中,将影像学无进展生存期作为替代终点进行外部验证,可能会加快mCRPC的药物研发,此前该领域因缺乏中间终点而受到阻碍。