Suppr超能文献

回应儿童虐待问题的关切:英格兰全科医生的定性研究。

Responses to concerns about child maltreatment: a qualitative study of GPs in England.

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL-Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 3;3(12):e003894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003894.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To provide a rich description of current responses to concerns related to child maltreatment among a sample of English general practitioners (GPs).

DESIGN

In-depth, face-to-face interviews (November 2010 to September 2011). Participants selected and discussed families who had prompted 'maltreatment-related concerns'. Thematic analysis of data.

SETTING

4 general practices in England.

PARTICIPANTS

14 GPs, 2 practice nurses and 2 health visitors from practices with at least 1 'expert' GP (expertise in child safeguarding/protection).

RESULTS

The concerns about neglect and emotional abuse dominated the interviews. GPs described intense and long-term involvement with families with multiple social and medical problems. Narratives were distilled into seven possible actions that GPs took in response to maltreatment-related concerns. These were orientated towards whole families (monitoring and advocating), the parents (coaching) and children (opportune healthcare), and included referral to or working with other services and recording concerns. Facilitators of the seven actions were: trusting relationships between GPs and parents, good working relationships with health visitors and framing the problem/response as 'medical'. Narratives indicated significant time and energy spent building facilitating relationships with parents with the aim of improving the child's well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

These GPs used core general practice skills for on-going management of families who prompted concerns about neglect and emotional abuse. Policy and research focus should be broadened to include strategies for direct intervention and on-going involvement by GPs, such as using their core skills during consultations and practice systems for monitoring families and encouraging presentation to general practice. Exemplars of current practice, such as those identified in our study, should be evaluated for feasibility and acceptability in representative general practice settings as well as tested for efficacy, safety and cost. The seven actions could form the basis for the 'lead professional' role in general practice as proposed in the 2013 version of 'Working Together 'guidance.

摘要

目的

为了在英国全科医生(GP)样本中提供对与虐待儿童相关问题的当前反应的详细描述。

设计

深入的面对面访谈(2010 年 11 月至 2011 年 9 月)。参与者选择并讨论了引起“虐待相关问题”的家庭。对数据进行主题分析。

地点

英格兰的 4 家全科医生诊所。

参与者

来自至少有 1 名“专家”全科医生(儿童保护/保护方面的专业知识)的实践中的 14 名全科医生、2 名执业护士和 2 名健康访视员。

结果

对忽视和情感虐待的关注主导了访谈。全科医生描述了与有多种社会和医疗问题的家庭的深入和长期的参与。叙述被提炼成全科医生对虐待相关问题的七种可能的反应。这些行动面向整个家庭(监测和倡导)、父母(指导)和孩子(适时的医疗保健),包括转介或与其他服务合作以及记录问题。七种行动的促进因素包括:全科医生和家长之间的信任关系、与健康访视员的良好工作关系以及将问题/反应框定为“医疗”。叙述表明,花费了大量的时间和精力来与有虐待儿童问题的父母建立促进关系,目的是改善孩子的福祉。

结论

这些全科医生使用了核心的全科医生技能来持续管理引起忽视和情感虐待问题的家庭。政策和研究重点应该扩大,包括针对全科医生的直接干预和持续参与的策略,例如在咨询和实践系统中使用他们的核心技能来监测家庭并鼓励到全科医生就诊。应该在代表性的全科医生实践环境中评估当前实践的范例,例如我们研究中确定的范例,以评估其可行性和可接受性,并测试其疗效、安全性和成本。这七种行动可以作为 2013 年版“共同合作”指南中提出的全科医生“主导专业人员”角色的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a128/3855649/d24cb3c5e0bd/bmjopen2013003894f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验