Roemer W W
Am J Psychoanal. 1986 Fall;46(3):249-62. doi: 10.1007/BF01250973.
Three issues associated with the lack of statistical evaluation of Horney's theory were presented. They are the preference for professional and clinical impression over the use of more objective methods for defining and evaluating behaviors; the difficulty involved in validly assessing the dysfunctional nature of the expansive type; and the disregard of many objective scales for intrapsychic processes that should be viewed in terms of the total "organization of personality." Leary's model was described as a systematic and formal set of procedures that are relevant and appropriate to the measurement of behavior within the context of Horney's theory. Additionally, a current study was cited that used Leary's model with significant results pertaining to the statistical implications of Leary's procedures and the adaptation of the model to Horney's theory. It is clear that any theory which presumes to provide therapeutic treatment to clients in an ethical manner must be critiqued and evaluated to safeguard the welfare of its clients. However, it is a common practice to accept therapeutic concepts that are nestled in a defined model without testing them in a relatively objective manner. With the help of Leary's circle matrix and operational procedures, it is crucial that Horney's constructs be further submitted to empirical testing on a formal basis. The procedures have been available since 1957.
文中提出了与霍妮理论缺乏统计评估相关的三个问题。它们分别是:相较于使用更客观的方法来定义和评估行为,更倾向于专业和临床印象;有效评估扩张型功能失调本质所涉及的困难;以及忽视了许多应从“人格整体组织”角度看待的心理内部过程的客观量表。利里的模型被描述为一套系统且形式化的程序,这些程序与在霍妮理论背景下测量行为相关且适用。此外,还引用了一项当前研究,该研究使用利里的模型得出了与利里程序的统计意义以及该模型对霍妮理论的适应性相关的显著结果。显然,任何以道德方式为客户提供治疗的理论都必须受到批判和评估,以保障客户的福祉。然而,常见的做法是接受嵌套在既定模型中的治疗概念,而不以相对客观的方式对其进行检验。借助利里的圆形矩阵和操作程序,至关重要的是,霍妮的构想应在正式基础上进一步接受实证检验。这些程序自1957年起就已存在。