Kroetz Kailin, Sanchirico James N, Armsworth Paul R, Banzhaf H Spencer
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2014 Mar;17(3):294-302. doi: 10.1111/ele.12230. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
Recent estimates reaffirm that conservation funds are insufficient to meet biodiversity conservation goals. Organisations focused on biodiversity conservation therefore need to capitalise on investments that societies make in environmental protection that provide ancillary benefits to biodiversity. Here, we undertake the first assessment of the potential ancillary benefits from the ballot box in the United States, where citizens vote on referenda to conserve lands for reasons that may not include biodiversity directly but that indirectly might enhance biodiversity conservation. Our results suggest that referenda occur in counties with significantly greater biodiversity than counties chosen at random. We also demonstrate that large potential gains for conservation are possible if the past and likely future outcomes of these ballot box measures are directly incorporated into national-scale conservation planning efforts. The possible synergies between ballot box measures and other biodiversity conservation efforts offer an under-utilised resource for supporting conservation.
近期的评估再次证实,保护资金不足以实现生物多样性保护目标。因此,专注于生物多样性保护的组织需要利用社会在环境保护方面的投资,这些投资能为生物多样性带来附带效益。在此,我们首次评估了美国投票箱带来的潜在附带效益,在美国,公民就公投进行投票,以保护土地,其原因可能不直接包括生物多样性,但可能间接促进生物多样性保护。我们的结果表明,公投所在的县的生物多样性显著高于随机选择的县。我们还证明,如果将这些投票箱措施的过去和未来可能的结果直接纳入国家层面的保护规划工作中,就有可能为保护带来巨大的潜在收益。投票箱措施与其他生物多样性保护努力之间可能存在的协同作用为支持保护工作提供了一种未得到充分利用的资源。