Associate Professor, Department of Society and Globalisation, Roskilde University, Denmark.
Disasters. 2014 Jan;38(1):1-21. doi: 10.1111/disa.12030.
This paper recommends the incorporation of an additional discursive dimension in famine diagnosis that draws on the number of reports referring to famine in the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)'s ReliefWeb database. Present-day diagnostic tools already apply the principle of triangulation with multiple indicators; the addition of a discursive diagnostic dimension would enable even more refined analysis, allowing more forcefully for the incorporation of the aspect of change. The newly devised discursive famine indices are used both to identify famines--in Ethiopia (2000), Malawi (2002), and Somalia (2011)--and to analyse key socioeconomic determinants of famine. The study finds that income (or poverty) together with state fragility appear to be the major determinants of cross-country variations in famine reporting, while political regimes do not appear to have any independent effect. The indices appear largely robust with regard to concerns about cross-country, semantic, and temporal biases.
本文建议在饥荒诊断中纳入一个额外的话语维度,该维度借鉴了联合国人道主义事务协调厅(人道协调厅)的 ReliefWeb 数据库中提到饥荒的报告数量。现有的诊断工具已经应用了多指标三角测量原则;增加话语诊断维度将能够进行更精细的分析,更有力地纳入变化方面。新设计的话语饥荒指数既用于识别埃塞俄比亚(2000 年)、马拉维(2002 年)和索马里(2011 年)的饥荒,也用于分析饥荒的主要社会经济决定因素。研究发现,收入(或贫困)加上国家脆弱性似乎是国家间饥荒报告差异的主要决定因素,而政治制度似乎没有任何独立影响。这些指数在国家间、语义和时间偏差方面的问题上似乎具有很大的稳健性。