Departments of Oncology and Population Sciences, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
Semin Oncol. 2013 Dec;40(6):709-25. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.09.006.
There is a fairly consistent, albeit non-universal body of research documenting cognitive declines after cancer and its treatments. While few of these studies have included subjects aged 65 years and older, it is logical to expect that older patients are at risk of cognitive decline. Here, we use breast cancer as an exemplar disease for inquiry into the intersection of aging and cognitive effects of cancer and its therapies. There are a striking number of common underlying potential biological risks and pathways for the development of cancer, cancer-related cognitive declines, and aging processes, including the development of a frail phenotype. Candidate shared pathways include changes in hormonal milieu, inflammation, oxidative stress, DNA damage and compromised DNA repair, genetic susceptibility, decreased brain blood flow or disruption of the blood-brain barrier, direct neurotoxicity, decreased telomere length, and cell senescence. There also are similar structure and functional changes seen in brain imaging studies of cancer patients and those seen with "normal" aging and Alzheimer's disease. Disentangling the role of these overlapping processes is difficult since they require aged animal models and large samples of older human subjects. From what we do know, frailty and its low cognitive reserve seem to be a clinically useful marker of risk for cognitive decline after cancer and its treatments. This and other results from this review suggest the value of geriatric assessments to identify older patients at the highest risk of cognitive decline. Further research is needed to understand the interactions between aging, genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors, and frailty phenotypes to best identify the subgroups of older patients at greatest risk for decline and to develop behavioral and pharmacological interventions targeting this group. We recommend that basic science and population trials be developed specifically for older hosts with intermediate endpoints of relevance to this group, including cognitive function and trajectories of frailty. Clinicians and their older patients can advance the field by active encouragement of and participation in research designed to improve the care and outcomes of the growing population of older cancer patients.
有相当一致的、尽管并非普遍存在的研究文献记录了癌症及其治疗后的认知能力下降。虽然这些研究很少包括 65 岁及以上的受试者,但可以合理地预期老年患者有认知能力下降的风险。在这里,我们以乳腺癌为例,探究衰老与癌症及其治疗的认知影响之间的交集。癌症、癌症相关认知能力下降和衰老过程有许多共同的潜在生物学风险和途径,包括脆弱表型的发展。候选共同途径包括激素环境、炎症、氧化应激、DNA 损伤和受损的 DNA 修复、遗传易感性、脑血流量减少或血脑屏障破坏、直接神经毒性、端粒缩短和细胞衰老的变化。在癌症患者的大脑影像学研究和“正常”衰老和阿尔茨海默病的大脑影像学研究中也观察到类似的结构和功能变化。由于这些重叠过程需要老年动物模型和大量老年人类受试者,因此很难理清它们的作用。根据我们所了解到的情况,虚弱及其低认知储备似乎是癌症及其治疗后认知能力下降的一个有用的临床风险标志物。这和其他来自这篇综述的结果表明,老年评估对于识别认知能力下降风险最高的老年患者具有价值。需要进一步的研究来了解衰老、遗传易感性、生活方式因素和脆弱表型之间的相互作用,以最好地确定认知能力下降风险最高的老年患者亚组,并开发针对这一组患者的行为和药物干预措施。我们建议专门为具有与该组相关的中间终点(包括认知功能和脆弱轨迹)的老年宿主开发基础科学和人群试验。临床医生及其老年患者可以通过积极鼓励和参与旨在改善不断增长的老年癌症患者群体的护理和结果的研究来推动该领域的发展。