Suppr超能文献

稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者由替格瑞洛转换为普拉格雷的药效学评估:SWAP-2 研究(转换抗血小板-2 治疗)的结果。

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of switching from ticagrelor to prasugrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Results of the SWAP-2 Study (Switching Anti Platelet-2).

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.

Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 22;63(15):1500-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.032. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects of switching patients from ticagrelor to prasugrel.

BACKGROUND

Clinicians may need to switch between more potent P2Y12 inhibitors because of adverse effects or switch to the use of a once-daily dosing regimen due to compliance issues.

METHODS

After a 3- to 5-day run-in phase with a ticagrelor 180-mg loading dose (LD) followed by a ticagrelor 90-mg twice-daily maintenance dose (MD), aspirin-treated patients (N = 110) with stable coronary artery disease were randomized to continue ticagrelor or switch to prasugrel 10-mg once-daily MD, with or without a 60-mg LD. Pharmacodynamic assessments were defined according to P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) (P2Y12 assay) and platelet reactivity index (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay) at baseline (before and after the run-in phase) and 2, 4, 24, and 48 h and 7 days after randomization.

RESULTS

Platelet reactivity was significantly greater at 24 and 48 h after switching to prasugrel versus continued therapy with ticagrelor, although to a lesser extent in those receiving an LD. Mean PRU remained significantly higher in the combined prasugrel groups versus the ticagrelor group (least-squares mean difference: 46 [95% confidence interval 25 to 67]) and did not meet the primary noninferiority endpoint (upper limit of the confidence interval ≤45), although PRU in the prasugrel cohort was lower at 7 days than at 24 or 48 h. Accordingly, rates of high on-treatment platelet reactivity were higher at 24 and 48 h in both prasugrel groups. At 7 days, there was no difference in high on-treatment platelet reactivity rate between the combined prasugrel and ticagrelor groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with continued ticagrelor therapy, switching from ticagrelor to prasugrel therapy was associated with an increase in platelet reactivity that was partially mitigated by the administration of an LD.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估将患者从替格瑞洛转换为普拉格雷的药效学效果。

背景

由于不良反应,临床医生可能需要在更有效的 P2Y12 抑制剂之间进行转换,或者由于依从性问题,需要转换为每日一次的给药方案。

方法

在使用替格瑞洛 180mg 负荷剂量(LD)进行 3 至 5 天的导入期后,接受阿司匹林治疗的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者(N=110)被随机分为继续使用替格瑞洛或转换为每日一次 10mg 普拉格雷维持剂量(MD),或同时给予 60mg LD。药效学评估根据 P2Y12 反应单位(PRU)(P2Y12 测定)和血小板反应指数(血管扩张刺激磷酸蛋白磷酸化测定)在基线(导入期前后)和随机分组后 2、4、24 和 48 小时以及 7 天进行定义。

结果

与继续使用替格瑞洛相比,转换为普拉格雷后 24 和 48 小时的血小板反应性显著增加,尽管在接受 LD 的患者中程度较小。在联合普拉格雷组中,平均 PRU 仍显著高于替格瑞洛组(最小二乘均数差值:46 [95%置信区间 25 至 67]),且未达到主要非劣效性终点(置信区间上限≤45),尽管普拉格雷组在 7 天时的 PRU 低于 24 或 48 小时。因此,在联合普拉格雷组中,在 24 和 48 小时时,高治疗期血小板反应性的发生率更高。在 7 天时,联合普拉格雷和替格瑞洛组之间高治疗期血小板反应性率无差异。

结论

与继续替格瑞洛治疗相比,从替格瑞洛转换为普拉格雷治疗与血小板反应性增加相关,而给予 LD 部分缓解了这种增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验