Arrhythmia Institute, Valley Health System, Ridgewood, New Jersey, New York, New York.
Arrhythmia Institute, Valley Health System, Ridgewood, New Jersey, New York, New York.
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Apr;11(4):595-601. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.12.013. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is associated with morbidity and mortality.
To determine the incidence and risk factors for CIED infection, to develop a scoring index for risk stratification, and to analyze the effect of the AIGISRx envelope on infection rates.
Consecutive patients who underwent a CIED procedure were identified and surveyed for 6 months for the development of an infection necessitating removal of all implanted hardware.
In the pre-envelope era, an infection occurred in 25 (1.5%) of 1651 patients. After its availability, an envelope was used in 275 (22%) of 1240 patients; an infection occurred in 8 (0.6%) patients in this era (P = .029 vs pre-envelope). In the overall cohort of 2891 patients, the infection rate was 1.2% and 3.5% in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device and those with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device, respectively (P = .018); in these patients, 7 independent risk factors predicted infection: early pocket re-exploration, male sex, diabetes, upgrade procedure, heart failure, hypertension, and glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min. A composite risk score (0-25; C index 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.61-0.83) was created by weight, adjusting these 7 factors: 3 groups emerged-low risk (score 0-7; 1% infection), medium risk (score 8-14; 3.4% infection), and high risk (score ≥15; 11.1% infection). The envelope reduced infections by 79% and 100% in the medium- and high-risk groups, respectively.
CIED infection most commonly occurred in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator device and those with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator device. A composite score based on clinical variables appeared feasible for infection risk stratification. The AIGISRx envelope significantly lowered the risk of CIED infection. Randomized clinical data are warranted.
心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)感染与发病率和死亡率有关。
确定 CIED 感染的发生率和危险因素,制定风险分层评分指数,并分析 AIGISRx 信封对感染率的影响。
确定连续接受 CIED 手术的患者,并对其进行为期 6 个月的调查,以确定需要移除所有植入硬件的感染。
在信封出现之前的时代,1651 例患者中有 25 例(1.5%)发生感染。在其可用之后,在 1240 例患者中有 275 例(22%)使用了信封;在此期间,有 8 例(0.6%)患者发生感染(P=0.029 比信封出现之前)。在 2891 例患者的总体队列中,感染率分别为 1.2%和 3.5%,植入式心脏复律除颤器设备和心脏再同步治疗除颤器设备的患者(P=0.018);在这些患者中,有 7 个独立的危险因素预测感染:早期口袋再探查、男性、糖尿病、升级程序、心力衰竭、高血压和肾小球滤过率 < 60 mL/min。通过权重创建了一个复合风险评分(0-25;C 指数 0.72;95%置信区间 0.61-0.83),调整了这 7 个因素:3 组出现低风险(评分 0-7;1%感染)、中风险(评分 8-14;3.4%感染)和高风险(评分≥15;11.1%感染)。信封分别将中风险和高风险组的感染率降低了 79%和 100%。
CIED 感染最常见于植入式心脏复律除颤器设备和心脏再同步治疗除颤器设备的患者。基于临床变量的复合评分似乎可用于感染风险分层。AIGISRx 信封显著降低了 CIED 感染的风险。需要随机临床数据。