Kay Richard F
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology & Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Duke University, Box 90383, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Jan;82 Pt B:358-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
Molecular data have converged on a consensus about the genus-level phylogeny of extant platyrrhine monkeys, but for most extinct taxa and certainly for those older than the Pleistocene we must rely upon morphological evidence from fossils. This raises the question as to how well anatomical data mirror molecular phylogenies and how best to deal with discrepancies between the molecular and morphological data as we seek to extend our phylogenies to the placement of fossil taxa. Here I present parsimony-based phylogenetic analyses of extant and fossil platyrrhines based on an anatomical dataset of 399 dental characters and osteological features of the cranium and postcranium. I sample 16 extant taxa (one from each platyrrhine genus) and 20 extinct taxa of platyrrhines. The tree structure is constrained with a "molecular scaffold" of extant species as implemented in maximum parsimony using PAUP with the molecular-based 'backbone' approach. The data set encompasses most of the known extinct species of platyrrhines, ranging in age from latest Oligocene (∼26 Ma) to the Recent. The tree is rooted with extant catarrhines, and Late Eocene and Early Oligocene African anthropoids. Among the more interesting patterns to emerge are: (1) known early platyrrhines from the Late Oligocene through Early Miocene (26-16.5Ma) represent only stem platyrrhine taxa; (2) representatives of the three living platyrrhine families first occur between 15.7 Ma and 13.5 Ma; and (3) recently extinct primates from the Greater Antilles (Cuba, Jamaica, Hispaniola) are sister to the clade of extant platyrrhines and may have diverged in the Early Miocene. It is probable that the crown platyrrhine clade did not originate before about 20-24 Ma, a conclusion consistent with the phylogenetic analysis of fossil taxa presented here and with recent molecular clock estimates. The following biogeographic scenario is consistent with the phylogenetic findings and climatic and geologic evidence: Tropical South America has been a center for platyrrhine diversification since platyrrhines arrived on the continent in the middle Cenozoic. Platyrrhines dispersed from tropical South America to Patagonia at ∼25-24 Ma via a "Paraná Portal" through eastern South America across a retreating Paranense Sea. Phylogenetic bracketing suggests Antillean primates arrived via a sweepstakes route or island chain from northern South America in the Early Miocene, not via a proposed land bridge or island chain (GAARlandia) in the Early Oligocene (∼34 Ma). Patagonian and Antillean platyrrhines went extinct without leaving living descendants, the former at the end of the Early Miocene and the latter within the past six thousand years. Molecular evidence suggests crown platyrrhines arrived in Central America by crossing an intermittent connection through the Isthmus of Panama at or after 3.5Ma. Any more ancient Central American primates, should they be discovered, are unlikely to have given rise to the extant Central American taxa in situ.
分子数据已就现存阔鼻猴类的属级系统发育达成共识,但对于大多数已灭绝的分类群,尤其是早于更新世的分类群,我们必须依靠化石的形态学证据。这就引出了一个问题,即解剖学数据在多大程度上反映分子系统发育,以及在我们试图将系统发育扩展到化石分类群的位置时,如何最好地处理分子数据和形态学数据之间的差异。在此,我基于一个包含399个牙齿特征以及颅骨和颅后骨骼特征的解剖学数据集,对现存和已灭绝的阔鼻猴类进行了基于简约法的系统发育分析。我选取了16个现存分类群(每个阔鼻猴属一个)和20个已灭绝的阔鼻猴分类群。树结构通过使用PAUP并采用基于分子的“主干”方法的最大简约法中实施的现存物种“分子支架”进行约束。该数据集涵盖了大多数已知的已灭绝阔鼻猴物种,年代范围从晚渐新世(约2600万年前)到近代。该树以现存的狭鼻猴类以及晚始新世和早渐新世的非洲类人猿为根。出现的一些更有趣的模式包括:(1)从晚渐新世到早中新世(2600 - 1650万年前)已知的早期阔鼻猴仅代表阔鼻猴类的干群分类群;(2)三个现存阔鼻猴科的代表首次出现在1570万年前至1350万年前之间;(3)大安的列斯群岛(古巴、牙买加、伊斯帕尼奥拉岛)最近灭绝的灵长类动物是现存阔鼻猴类分支的姐妹群,可能在早中新世就已分化。冠阔鼻猴类分支很可能在约2000 - 2400万年前之前并未起源,这一结论与本文提出的化石分类群的系统发育分析以及最近的分子钟估计一致。以下生物地理情景与系统发育结果以及气候和地质证据相符:自阔鼻猴在中新生代抵达南美洲大陆以来,热带南美洲一直是阔鼻猴多样化的中心。阔鼻猴在约2500 - 2400万年前通过一个“巴拉那门户”从热带南美洲扩散到巴塔哥尼亚,该门户穿过南美洲东部,跨越逐渐退缩的巴拉那海。系统发育推断表明,安的列斯群岛灵长类动物是在早中新世通过抽奖路线或岛链从南美洲北部抵达的,而不是通过早渐新世(约3400万年前)提出的陆桥或岛链(GAARlandia)。巴塔哥尼亚和安的列斯群岛阔鼻猴灭绝且未留下现存后代,前者在早中新世末期灭绝,后者在过去六千年内灭绝。分子证据表明,冠阔鼻猴在350万年前或之后通过穿过巴拿马地峡的间歇性连接抵达中美洲。如果发现任何更古老的中美洲灵长类动物,它们不太可能在原地产生现存的中美洲分类群。