Klineberg Eric, Gupta Munish, McCarthy Ian, Hostin Richard
*Department of Orthopaedics, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA†Institute for Health Care Research and Improvement, Baylor Health Care System‡Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas§Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, TX.
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Oct;29(8):318-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000062.
Single-center, retrospective study of consecutive surgeries.
This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of previously published anterior fusion grading systems and assess the ability of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes to predict pseudarthrosis (PSAR).
Despite existing radiographic indicators, PSAR may still go unidentified on biplanar radiographs, and little data is available on the reliability of such grading systems in adult spinal deformity patients. As such, there is a need for a practical, noninvasive tool to help identify PSAR.
This study included consecutive primary surgical patients with idiopathic or degenerative scoliosis undergoing anterior and posterior correction with instrumentation to the sacrum or pelvis and minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were grouped into fused (no radiographic or clinical signs of PSAR) and PSAR (known PSAR diagnosed by surgical exploration or thin-cut computed tomography scan at least 1 year after surgery) cohorts. Two-year radiographs were graded by an independent blinded orthopedic deformity surgeon and a neuroradiologist. HRQOL scores [22-item Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] at 1-year follow-up were analyzed as potential predictors of future PSAR.
Thirty-four patients with average follow-up of 2.2 years (2-2.5 y) were evaluated. Eight (23.5%) patients had known PSAR consisting of 40 (24.8%) anterior levels. Analysis by independent reviewers incorrectly identified 2 levels as unfused and failed to identify any PSAR levels. The PSAR group had lower average SRS scores in all domains and lower average ODI scores at 1-year postoperatively relative to fused patients. The PSAR group also showed no significant improvement in SRS or ODI scores relative to baseline. In comparison, the fused group showed significant improvement in all domains.
Standard radiographs are insufficient for identifying PSAR in adult spinal deformity patients. Failure to achieve significant improvement in SRS and ODI should lead the surgeon to suspect PSAR and consider additional investigation.
对连续手术进行的单中心回顾性研究。
本研究旨在评估先前发表的前路融合分级系统的可靠性,并评估健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)结果预测假关节形成(PSAR)的能力。
尽管存在现有的影像学指标,但在双平面X线片上仍可能无法识别PSAR,并且关于此类分级系统在成人脊柱畸形患者中的可靠性的数据很少。因此,需要一种实用的非侵入性工具来帮助识别PSAR。
本研究纳入了连续的原发性手术患者,这些患者患有特发性或退行性脊柱侧弯,接受了前路和后路矫正并固定至骶骨或骨盆,且至少随访2年。患者被分为融合组(无PSAR的影像学或临床体征)和PSAR组(通过手术探查或术后至少1年的薄层计算机断层扫描确诊的已知PSAR)队列。由一名独立的、不知情的骨科畸形外科医生和一名神经放射科医生对术后2年的X线片进行分级。分析1年随访时的HRQOL评分[22项脊柱侧弯研究学会问卷(SRS-22)和奥斯威斯利残疾指数(ODI)]作为未来PSAR的潜在预测指标。
对34例平均随访2.2年(2 - 2.5年)的患者进行了评估。8例(23.5%)患者已知患有PSAR,包括40个(24.8%)前路节段。独立 reviewers 的分析错误地将2个节段识别为未融合,且未识别出任何PSAR节段。与融合患者相比,PSAR组在术后1年时所有领域的平均SRS评分较低,平均ODI评分也较低。PSAR组的SRS或ODI评分相对于基线也没有显著改善。相比之下,融合组在所有领域均有显著改善。
标准X线片不足以识别成人脊柱畸形患者中的PSAR。SRS和ODI未能实现显著改善应促使外科医生怀疑PSAR并考虑进一步检查。