Di Rocco Federico, Ben Gbulie Uzoma, Meyer Philippe, Arnaud Eric
From the *Craniofacial Unit, Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, and †Department of Anesthesiology, APHP, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Jan;25(1):39-41. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2f799.
Many techniques and protocols are currently used in the treatment of scaphocephaly worldwide, including total calvarial remodeling and minimally invasive strip craniectomies. This study reviews current techniques and protocols used in young infants (aged ≤ 6 months) as well as the outcomes in terms of reoperation rates.
A short questionnaire was designed including questions about the preferred surgical techniques, transfusion protocols, and reoperation rates. Surgeons from the International Society of Craniofacial Surgery and the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery were requested to respond to this questionnaire online or by e-mail. Responses during a 2-week period were collated and analyzed using Fisher exact test.
A total of 91 surgeons responded from the craniofacial centers around the world, of which 93.4% completed the questionnaire. Most respondents were from North America and Europe (35% and 20%, respectively). The operative volume was less than 15 cases per year in 56%, and the bicoronal skin incision was most commonly used (81%). Postoperative drainage was not performed by 55% but was statistically more common with use of the bicoronal incision (P = 0.029). Of the respondents, 66% used calvarial remodeling, and 34% strip craniectomy. Blood was most commonly transfused at a hemoglobin level under 8 g/dL (31%), with a mean transfusion rate of 66%. Of the respondents, 44% transfused in more than 90% of the cases, whereas only 18% transfused in 20% or less of the cases. The mean reoperation rate for secondary fusion was 1.7%, and 41% of the respondents claimed a 0% reoperation rate. A statistically higher frequency of reoperation was reported by centers with a case load of more than 15 cases per year (P = 0.035), and no statistical correlation was found with the type of surgical technique.
Our survey of neurosurgeons and craniofacial plastic surgeons worldwide shows that for young infants treated for scaphocephaly, the bicoronal incision is most commonly used and a greater number of surgeons do not use drains. A great variability in the transfusion protocols used in the care of these patients as well as a low reoperation rate were also found. The latter however may suggest a lack of strict monitoring in most centers. Overall, this study presents a snapshot of the current surgical treatment of this subset of patients and should serve as a basis for quality improvement and outcome monitoring in their surgical management.
目前全球范围内治疗舟状头畸形采用多种技术和方案,包括全颅骨重塑和微创条状颅骨切除术。本研究回顾了用于小婴儿(年龄≤6个月)的当前技术和方案以及再次手术率方面的结果。
设计了一份简短问卷,包括有关首选手术技术、输血方案和再次手术率的问题。要求国际颅面外科学会和国际小儿神经外科学会的外科医生通过在线或电子邮件回复此问卷。对2周内的回复进行整理,并使用Fisher精确检验进行分析。
全球颅面中心共有91位外科医生回复,其中93.4%完成了问卷。大多数受访者来自北美和欧洲(分别为35%和20%)。56%的医生每年手术量少于15例,最常使用双冠状皮肤切口(81%)。55%的医生不进行术后引流,但在使用双冠状切口时在统计学上更常见(P = 0.029)。在受访者中,66%使用颅骨重塑,34%使用条状颅骨切除术。最常在血红蛋白水平低于8 g/dL时输血(31%),平均输血率为66%。在受访者中,44%在90%以上的病例中输血,而只有18%在20%或更少的病例中输血。二次融合的平均再次手术率为1.7%,41%的受访者声称再次手术率为0%。每年病例数超过15例的中心报告的再次手术频率在统计学上更高(P = 0.035),且未发现与手术技术类型存在统计学相关性。
我们对全球神经外科医生和颅面整形外科医生的调查表明,对于接受舟状头畸形治疗的小婴儿,最常使用双冠状切口,且更多的外科医生不使用引流。在这些患者的护理中使用的输血方案也存在很大差异,且再次手术率较低。然而,后者可能表明大多数中心缺乏严格的监测。总体而言,本研究呈现了当前这部分患者外科治疗的概况,应为其外科管理中的质量改进和结果监测提供依据。