Suppr超能文献

2002年至2007年医生抗精神病药物处方偏好的变化

Changes in physician antipsychotic prescribing preferences, 2002-2007.

作者信息

Donohue Julie, O'Malley A James, Horvitz-Lennon Marcela, Taub Anna Levine, Berndt Ernst R, Huskamp Haiden A

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):315-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200536.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Physician antipsychotic prescribing behavior may be influenced by comparative effectiveness evidence, regulatory warnings, and formulary and other restrictions on these drugs. This study measured changes in the degree to which physicians are able to customize treatment choices and changes in physician preferences for specific agents after these events.

METHODS

The study used 2002-2007 prescribing data from the IMS Health Xponent database and data on physician characteristics from the American Medical Association for a longitudinal cohort of 7,399 physicians. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were conducted of the concentration of prescribing (physician-level Herfindahl index) and preferences for and likelihood of prescribing two first-generation antipsychotics and six second-generation antipsychotics. Analyses adjusted for prescribing volume, specialty, demographic characteristics, practice setting, and education.

RESULTS

Antipsychotic prescribing was highly concentrated at the physician level, with a mean unadjusted Herfindahl index of .33 in 2002 and .29 in 2007. Psychiatrists reduced the concentration of their prescribing more over time than did other physicians. High-volume psychiatrists had a Herfindahl index that was half that of low-volume physicians in other specialties (.18 versus .36), a difference that remained significant (p<.001) after adjustment for physician characteristics. The share of physicians preferring olanzapine dropped from 29.9% in 2002 to 10.3% in 2007 (p<.001) while the share favoring quetiapine increased from 9.4% to 44.5% (p<.001). Few physicians (<5%) preferred a first-generation antipsychotic in 2002 or 2007.

CONCLUSIONS

Preferences for specific antipsychotics changed dramatically during this period. Although physician prescribing remained heavily concentrated, the concentration decreased over time, particularly among psychiatrists.

摘要

目的

医生的抗精神病药物处方行为可能会受到疗效对比证据、监管警示以及这些药物的处方集和其他限制因素的影响。本研究衡量了在这些事件发生后医生能够定制治疗选择的程度变化以及医生对特定药物偏好的变化。

方法

该研究使用了来自艾美仕市场研究公司(IMS Health)Xponent数据库的2002 - 2007年处方数据以及来自美国医学协会的医生特征数据,研究对象为7399名医生的纵向队列。对处方集中度(医生层面的赫芬达尔指数)以及两种第一代抗精神病药物和六种第二代抗精神病药物的处方偏好和可能性进行了描述性和多变量回归分析。分析对处方量、专业、人口统计学特征、执业环境和教育程度进行了调整。

结果

抗精神病药物处方在医生层面高度集中,2002年未调整的平均赫芬达尔指数为0.33,2007年为0.29。随着时间的推移,精神科医生处方的集中度下降幅度比其他医生更大。高处方量的精神科医生的赫芬达尔指数是其他专业低处方量医生的一半(0.18对0.36),在对医生特征进行调整后,这种差异仍然显著(p<0.001)。2002年至2007年,偏好奥氮平的医生比例从29.9%降至10.3%(p<0.001),而偏好喹硫平的医生比例从9.4%增至44.5%(p<0.001)。2002年或2007年,很少有医生(<5%)偏好第一代抗精神病药物。

结论

在此期间,对特定抗精神病药物的偏好发生了巨大变化。虽然医生的处方仍然高度集中,但随着时间的推移集中度有所下降,尤其是在精神科医生中。

相似文献

1
Changes in physician antipsychotic prescribing preferences, 2002-2007.
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):315-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200536.
3
How quickly do physicians adopt new drugs? The case of second-generation antipsychotics.
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Apr 1;64(4):324-30. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200186.
4
Diffusion of antipsychotics in the US And French markets, 1998-2008.
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Jul 1;64(7):680-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.004662012.
6
Patterns of Antipsychotic Prescribing by Physicians to Young Children.
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Dec 1;67(12):1307-1314. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500224. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
8
Medical decision making in antipsychotic drug choice for schizophrenia.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jul;161(7):1301-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.7.1301.
9
Antipsychotic prescribing: do conflict of interest policies make a difference?
Med Care. 2015 Apr;53(4):338-45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000329.
10
The heterogeneity of concentrated prescribing behavior: Theory and evidence from antipsychotics.
J Health Econ. 2015 Mar;40:26-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

2
The definition and measurement of heterogeneity.
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 24;10(1):299. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00986-0.
3
We need an operational framework for heterogeneity in psychiatric research.
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2020 Jan 1;45(1):3-6. doi: 10.1503/jpn.190198.
7
Risk of weight gain for specific antipsychotic drugs: a meta-analysis.
NPJ Schizophr. 2018 Jun 27;4(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41537-018-0053-9.
8
Use of Academic Detailing With Audit and Feedback to Improve Antipsychotic Pharmacotherapy.
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Sep 1;69(9):1021-1028. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700536. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
Gaps in Psychiatric Training Could Challenge Delivery of Optimal Schizophrenia Pharmacotherapy.
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;63(2):146-147. doi: 10.1177/0706743717739549.
10
Antipsychotic Use Pattern in Schizophrenia Outpatients: Correlates of Polypharmacy.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2017 Aug 11;13:92-103. doi: 10.2174/1745017901713010092. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and providers, 2001-2010.
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e55504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055504. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
2
Is Customization in Antidepressant Prescribing Associated with Acute-Phase Treatment Adherence?
J Pharm Health Serv Res. 2012 Mar 1;3(1):11-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-8893.2011.00068.x. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
4
Sources of regional variation in Medicare Part D drug spending.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 9;366(6):530-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1104816.
5
The NIMH-CATIE Schizophrenia Study: what did we learn?
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;168(8):770-5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11010039.
6
Customization in prescribing for bipolar disorder.
Health Econ. 2012 Jun;21(6):653-68. doi: 10.1002/hec.1737. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
8
Impact of FDA black box advisory on antipsychotic medication use.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 11;170(1):96-103. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.456.
9
National trends in psychotropic medication polypharmacy in office-based psychiatry.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;67(1):26-36. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.175.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验