Division of Outcomes and Effectiveness, Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York2Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;71(2):176-81. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2862.
There have been recent calls for increased access to mental health services, but access may be limited owing to psychiatrist refusal to accept insurance.
To describe recent trends in acceptance of insurance by psychiatrists compared with physicians in other specialties.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data from a national survey of office-based physicians in the United States to calculate rates of acceptance of private noncapitated insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid by psychiatrists vs physicians in other specialties and to compare characteristics of psychiatrists who accepted insurance and those who did not.
Our main outcome variables were physician acceptance of new patients with private noncapitated insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid. Our main independent variables were physician specialty and year groupings (2005-2006, 2007-2008, and 2009-2010).
The percentage of psychiatrists who accepted private noncapitated insurance in 2009-2010 was significantly lower than the percentage of physicians in other specialties (55.3% [95% CI, 46.7%-63.8%] vs 88.7% [86.4%-90.7%]; P < .001) and had declined by 17.0% since 2005-2006. Similarly, the percentage of psychiatrists who accepted Medicare in 2009-2010 was significantly lower than that for other physicians (54.8% [95% CI, 46.6%-62.7%] vs 86.1% [84.4%-87.7%]; P < .001) and had declined by 19.5% since 2005-2006. Psychiatrists' Medicaid acceptance rates in 2009-2010 were also lower than those for other physicians (43.1% [95% CI, 34.9%-51.7%] vs 73.0% [70.3%-75.5%]; P < .001) but had not declined significantly from 2005-2006. Psychiatrists in the Midwest were more likely to accept private noncapitated insurance (85.1%) than those in the Northeast (48.5%), South (43.0%), or West (57.8%) (P = .02).
Acceptance rates for all types of insurance were significantly lower for psychiatrists than for physicians in other specialties. These low rates of acceptance may pose a barrier to access to mental health services.
最近有人呼吁增加获得心理健康服务的机会,但由于精神科医生拒绝接受保险,这种机会可能会受到限制。
描述与其他专业的医生相比,精神科医生最近接受保险的趋势。
设计、地点和参与者:我们使用了一项针对美国门诊医生的全国性调查数据,计算了精神科医生和其他专业医生接受私人非免赔保险、医疗保险和医疗补助的比例,并比较了接受保险和不接受保险的精神科医生的特征。
我们的主要结果变量是医生接受新的私人非免赔保险、医疗保险或医疗补助患者的比例。我们的主要自变量是医生的专业和年份分组(2005-2006 年、2007-2008 年和 2009-2010 年)。
2009-2010 年接受私人非免赔保险的精神科医生比例明显低于其他专业医生(55.3%[95%CI,46.7%-63.8%] vs 88.7%[86.4%-90.7%];P<.001),自 2005-2006 年以来下降了 17.0%。同样,2009-2010 年接受医疗保险的精神科医生比例也明显低于其他医生(54.8%[95%CI,46.6%-62.7%] vs 86.1%[84.4%-87.7%];P<.001),自 2005-2006 年以来下降了 19.5%。2009-2010 年精神科医生接受医疗补助的比例也低于其他医生(43.1%[95%CI,34.9%-51.7%] vs 73.0%[70.3%-75.5%];P<.001),但自 2005-2006 年以来并未显著下降。中西部地区的精神科医生比东北部(48.5%)、南部(43.0%)或西部(57.8%)的精神科医生更愿意接受私人非免赔保险(P=0.02)。
与其他专业的医生相比,所有类型保险的接受率都明显较低。这种低接受率可能会成为获得心理健康服务的障碍。