Volpe Donna A, Hamed Salaheldin S, Zhang Lei K
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993-0002, USA,
AAPS J. 2014 Jan;16(1):172-80. doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9554-7. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
Drug interactions due to efflux transporters may result in one drug increasing or decreasing the systemic exposure of a second drug. The potential for in vivo drug interactions is estimated through in vitro cell assays. Variability in in vitro parameter determination (e.g., IC₅₀ values) among laboratories may lead to different conclusions in in vivo interaction predictions. The objective of this study was to investigate variability in in vitro inhibition potency determination that may be due to calculation methods. In a Caco-2 cell assay, the absorptive and secretive permeability of digoxin was measured in the presence of spironolactone, itraconazole and vardenafil. From the permeability data, the efflux ratio and net secretory flux where calculated for each inhibitor. IC₅₀ values were then calculated using a variety of equations and software programs. All three drugs decreased the secretory transport of digoxin in a concentration-dependent manner while increasing digoxin's absorption to a lesser extent. The resulting IC₅₀ values varied according to the parameter evaluated, whether percent inhibition or percent control was applied, and the computational IC₅₀ equation. This study has shown that multiple methods used to quantitate the inhibition of drug efflux in a cell assay can result in different IC₅₀ values. The variability in the results in this study points to a need to standardize any transporter assay and calculation methods within a laboratory and to validate the assay with a set of known inhibitors and non-inhibitors against a clinically relevant substrate.
外排转运体引起的药物相互作用可能导致一种药物增加或减少另一种药物的全身暴露量。体内药物相互作用的可能性通过体外细胞试验来估计。各实验室之间体外参数测定(如IC₅₀值)的差异可能导致体内相互作用预测得出不同结论。本研究的目的是调查可能因计算方法导致的体外抑制效力测定的差异。在一项Caco-2细胞试验中,在存在螺内酯、伊曲康唑和伐地那非的情况下测量了地高辛的吸收性和分泌性通透性。根据通透性数据,计算每种抑制剂的外排率和净分泌通量。然后使用各种方程和软件程序计算IC₅₀值。所有三种药物均以浓度依赖性方式降低地高辛的分泌转运,同时在较小程度上增加地高辛的吸收。所得的IC₅₀值根据所评估的参数、应用的是抑制百分比还是对照百分比以及计算IC₅₀的方程而有所不同。本研究表明,用于定量细胞试验中药物外排抑制的多种方法可能导致不同的IC₅₀值。本研究结果的差异表明,需要在一个实验室内对任何转运体试验和计算方法进行标准化,并使用一组已知的抑制剂和非抑制剂针对临床相关底物对试验进行验证。