Suppr超能文献

男男性行为人群中的灌肠使用:一项具有 HIV/性传播感染预防意义的行为流行病学研究。

Enema use among men who have sex with men: a behavioral epidemiologic study with implications for HIV/STI prevention.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, WBOB-300, 1300 2nd St. South, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA,

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2014 May;43(4):755-69. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0203-0. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

Abstract

Enema use or douching is a risk factor for HIV/STI in men who have sex with men (MSM). However, few studies have explored enema use practices. We examined the frequency of enema use, type of products used, and reasons to use and not to use before and after receptive anal sex in a large sample of MSM (N = 4,992) recruited from 16 U.S. cities. Through online surveys, we examined personal, behavioral, and environmental factors associated with enema use. Most (52 %) participants reported having douched at least once and 35 % reported douching within the last 3 months. While most (88 %) reported enema use before receptive anal sex, 28 % douched after receptive anal sex. Most participants (65 %) used water to douche, 24 % added salt, soap, and/or antibacterial products to water, and 30 % reported using commercially available products. Being a man of color, HIV-positive, diagnosed with an STI, identifying as "versatile" in sex, and having more than two unprotected sex partners were significantly associated with recent enema use. Douching behavior appears closely associated with HIV/STI risk. Douching with water may be a concern since it may increase HIV/STI infection by damaging the epithelium. Development and promotion of a non-damaging, non-water based enema specifically for use in anal sex are recommended. In addition, the seemingly contradictory recommendations that water-based lubricant is recommended for anal sex but water-based enemas are dangerous need to be reconciled into a single consistent message.

摘要

灌肠或冲洗是男男性行为者(MSM)中 HIV/性传播感染(STI)的一个风险因素。然而,很少有研究探索过灌肠的使用情况。我们在一个来自美国 16 个城市的大量 MSM(n=4992)样本中,调查了在接受肛交前后灌肠的频率、使用的产品类型以及使用和不使用的原因。通过在线调查,我们研究了与灌肠使用相关的个人、行为和环境因素。大多数(52%)参与者报告至少冲洗过一次,35%报告在最近三个月内冲洗过。虽然大多数(88%)人报告在接受肛交前有灌肠,但 28%的人在接受肛交后冲洗。大多数参与者(65%)用水冲洗,24%在水中加入盐、肥皂和/或抗菌产品,30%报告使用市售产品。身为有色人种、HIV 阳性、被诊断出患有性传播感染、被认定为“万能”性行为者,以及拥有两个以上无保护的性伴侣,这些因素与近期的灌肠使用显著相关。灌肠行为似乎与 HIV/STI 风险密切相关。用水冲洗可能是一个问题,因为它可能会通过破坏上皮细胞而增加 HIV/STI 感染的风险。建议开发和推广一种非损伤性、非水基的灌肠剂,专门用于肛交。此外,需要将看似矛盾的建议——水基润滑剂推荐用于肛交,而水基灌肠剂则危险——调和成一个单一的一致信息。

相似文献

1
Enema use among men who have sex with men: a behavioral epidemiologic study with implications for HIV/STI prevention.
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 May;43(4):755-69. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0203-0. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
2
4
Rectal Douching Associated with Receptive Anal Intercourse: A Literature Review.
AIDS Behav. 2018 Apr;22(4):1288-1294. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1959-3.
7
Why rectal douches may be acceptable rectal-microbicide delivery vehicles for men who have sex with men.
Sex Transm Dis. 2010 Apr;37(4):228-33. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181bf9b2d.
9
Prevalence and Correlates of Rectal Douching and Enema Use Among Black Sexual Minority Men and Black Transwomen in the Deep South.
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Aug;49(6):1915-1922. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01605-w. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
10
Getting Clear About Rectal Douching Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Oct;50(7):2911-2920. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-01933-w. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

2
Sexual health and treatment-related sexual dysfunction in sexual and gender minorities with prostate cancer.
Nat Rev Urol. 2023 Jun;20(6):332-355. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00778-3. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
How Old Is He Really? The Association Between "Gay Age" and Sexual Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.
Sex Transm Dis. 2023 Feb 1;50(2):107-111. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001728. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
4
Getting Clear About Rectal Douching Among Men Who Have Sex With Men.
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Oct;50(7):2911-2920. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-01933-w. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
Rectal Douching and Microbicide Acceptability among Young Men who Have Sex with Men.
AIDS Behav. 2020 May;24(5):1414-1421. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02662-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Drinking settings, alcohol consumption, and sexual risk behavior among gay men.
Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;38(3):1824-30. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.11.011. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
2
Validating a shortened depression scale (10 item CES-D) among HIV-positive people in British Columbia, Canada.
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040793. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
4
Revision, criterion validity, and multigroup assessment of the reactions to homosexuality scale.
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):568-76. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.513300.
6
Why rectal douches may be acceptable rectal-microbicide delivery vehicles for men who have sex with men.
Sex Transm Dis. 2010 Apr;37(4):228-33. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181bf9b2d.
8
HIV risk and the internet: results of the Men's INTernet Sex (MINTS) Study.
AIDS Behav. 2009 Aug;13(4):746-56. doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9399-8. Epub 2008 May 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验