Suppr超能文献

使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的患者接受度洛西汀治疗时的出血风险:安慰剂对照试验及上市后不良事件报告分析

The risk of bleeding with duloxetine treatment in patients who use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): analysis of placebo-controlled trials and post-marketing adverse event reports.

作者信息

Perahia David G, Bangs Mark E, Zhang Qi, Cheng Yingkai, Ahl Jonna, Frakes Elijah P, Adams Michael J, Martinez James M

机构信息

Neurosciences, Lilly Research Centre, Windlesham, Surrey, UK.

Neurosciences, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2013 Nov 25;5:211-9. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S45445. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the safety of duloxetine with regards to bleeding-related events in patients who concomitantly did, versus did not, use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including aspirin.

METHODS

Safety data from all placebo-controlled trials of duloxetine conducted between December 1993 and December 2010, and post-marketing reports from duloxetine-treated patients in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), were searched for bleeding-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The percentage of patients with bleeding-related TEAEs was summarized and compared between treatment groups in all the placebo-controlled studies. Differences between NSAID user and non-user subgroups from clinical trial data were analyzed by a logistic regression model that included therapy, NSAID use, and therapy-by-NSAID subgroup interaction. In addition, to determine if higher duloxetine doses are associated with an increased incidence of bleeding-related TEAEs, and whether the use of concomitant NSAIDs might influence the dose effect if one exists, placebo-controlled clinical trials with duloxetine fixed doses of 60 mg, 120 mg, and placebo were analyzed. Also, the incidence of bleeding-related TEAEs reported for duloxetine alone was compared with the incidence in patients treated with duloxetine and concomitant NSAIDs. Finally, the number of bleeding-related cases reported for duloxetine in the FAERS database was compared with the numbers reported for all other drugs.

RESULTS

Across duloxetine clinical trials, there was a significantly greater incidence of bleeding-related TEAEs in duloxetine- versus placebo-treated patients overall and also in those patients who did not take concomitant NSAIDS, but no significant difference was seen among those patients who did take concomitant NSAIDS. There was no significant difference in the incidence of bleeding-related TEAEs in the subset of patients treated with duloxetine 120 mg once daily versus those treated with 60 mg once daily regardless of concomitant NSAID use. The combination of duloxetine and NSAIDs was associated with a statistically significantly higher incidence of bleeding-related TEAEs compared with duloxetine alone. A similarly higher incidence of bleeding-related TEAEs was seen in patients treated with placebo and concomitant NSAIDs compared with placebo alone. Bleeding-related TEAEs reported in the FAERS database were disproportionally more frequent for duloxetine taken with NSAIDs compared with the full FAERS background, but there was no difference in the reporting of bleeding-related TEAEs when the cases reported for duloxetine taken with NSAIDs were compared against the cases reported for NSAIDs alone.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant use of NSAIDs was associated with a higher incidence of bleeding-related TEAEs in clinical trials regardless of whether patients were taking duloxetine or placebo; bleeding-related TEAEs did not appear to increase along with duloxetine dose regardless of NSAID use. In spontaneously reported post-marketing data, the combination of duloxetine and NSAID use was not associated with an increased reporting of bleeding-related events when compared to NSAID use alone.

摘要

目的

评估度洛西汀在同时使用与未使用包括阿司匹林在内的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的患者中与出血相关事件有关的安全性。

方法

检索1993年12月至2010年12月间进行的所有度洛西汀安慰剂对照试验的安全性数据,以及美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中度洛西汀治疗患者的上市后报告,以查找与出血相关的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)。总结所有安慰剂对照研究中治疗组间出现与出血相关TEAEs的患者百分比并进行比较。通过包含治疗、NSAIDs使用以及治疗与NSAIDs亚组相互作用的逻辑回归模型分析来自临床试验数据的NSAIDs使用者和非使用者亚组之间的差异。此外,为确定较高剂量度洛西汀是否与出血相关TEAEs发生率增加相关,以及如果存在剂量效应,同时使用NSAIDs是否可能影响该效应,分析了度洛西汀固定剂量60mg、120mg和安慰剂的安慰剂对照临床试验。此外,比较单独使用度洛西汀报告的出血相关TEAEs发生率与度洛西汀和NSAIDs同时使用患者的发生率。最后,将FAERS数据库中度洛西汀报告的出血相关病例数与所有其他药物报告的病例数进行比较。

结果

在度洛西汀的临床试验中,总体上度洛西汀治疗组与安慰剂治疗组相比,以及未同时服用NSAIDs的患者中,出血相关TEAEs的发生率显著更高,但在同时服用NSAIDs的患者中未观察到显著差异。无论是否同时使用NSAIDs,每日一次服用120mg度洛西汀的患者亚组与每日一次服用60mg度洛西汀的患者亚组相比,出血相关TEAEs的发生率无显著差异。与单独使用度洛西汀相比,度洛西汀与NSAIDs联合使用与出血相关TEAEs的发生率在统计学上显著更高。与单独使用安慰剂相比,使用安慰剂并同时使用NSAIDs的患者中也观察到出血相关TEAEs发生率同样更高。与整个FAERS背景相比,FAERS数据库中报告的与度洛西汀和NSAIDs联合使用相关的出血相关TEAEs比例更高,但将度洛西汀与NSAIDs联合使用报告的病例与单独使用NSAIDs报告的病例进行比较时,出血相关TEAEs的报告无差异。

结论

在临床试验中,无论患者是服用度洛西汀还是安慰剂,同时使用NSAIDs均与出血相关TEAEs的发生率较高相关;无论是否使用NSAIDs,出血相关TEAEs似乎均不会随着度洛西汀剂量增加而增加。在自发报告的上市后数据中,与单独使用NSAIDs相比,度洛西汀与NSAIDs联合使用与出血相关事件报告增加无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c66a/3849082/d65607d337a3/dhps-5-211Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验