Zakkar Mustafa, Kanagasabay Robin, Hunt Ian
Department of Cardiothoracic, St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):488-93. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt502. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether manual closure of the bronchial stump is safer with lower failure rates than mechanical closure using a stapling device following anatomical lung resection. One hundred and twenty-nine papers were identified using the search below. Eight papers presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question as they included sufficient number of patients to reach conclusions regarding the issues of interest for this review. Complications, complication rates and operation time were included in the assessment. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of the papers are tabulated. When looking at manual vs mechanical staples, it was noted that stapler failure can occur in around 4% of cases. The rate of bronchopleural fistula (BPF) development varied more in patients who underwent manual closure (1.5-12.5%) than in patients who underwent mechanical closure (1-5.7%). Although most of the studies reviewed showed no statistical differences between manual and mechanical closure in terms of BPF development, one study, however, showed that manual closure was significantly associated with lower numbers of postoperative BPF, while another study showed that mechanical closure is significantly associated with lower incidence of BPF. When looking at the role of the learning curve and training opportunities, it seems that the surgeon's inexperience when using mechanical staples can contribute to BPF development. A surgeon's experience can play a major role in the prevention of BPF development in patients having manual closure. Manual closure can provide a cheap and reliable technique when compared with costs incurred from using staplers, it is applicable in all situations and can be taught to surgeons in training with an acceptable risk. However, there is a lack of evidence to suggest that manual closure is better than mechanical stapler closure following anatomical lung resection.
根据结构化方案撰写了一篇心胸外科的最佳证据主题文章。所探讨的问题是,在解剖性肺切除术后,手工闭合支气管残端是否比使用吻合器进行机械闭合更安全且失败率更低。通过以下检索方式共识别出129篇论文。八篇论文提供了回答该临床问题的最佳证据,因为它们纳入了足够数量的患者,能够就本综述感兴趣的问题得出结论。评估内容包括并发症、并发症发生率和手术时间。文章的作者、期刊、出版日期和国家、研究的患者群体、研究类型、相关结果、结果以及研究的不足之处均以表格形式列出。在比较手工缝合与机械吻合器时,发现吻合器失败率约为4%。手工闭合患者发生支气管胸膜瘘(BPF)的发生率差异更大(1.5 - 12.5%),而机械闭合患者的发生率为(1 - 5.7%)。尽管大多数综述研究表明,在BPF发生方面,手工闭合和机械闭合之间无统计学差异,但有一项研究表明,手工闭合与术后BPF数量较少显著相关,而另一项研究表明,机械闭合与BPF发生率较低显著相关。在探讨学习曲线和培训机会的作用时,似乎外科医生使用机械吻合器时缺乏经验会导致BPF的发生。外科医生的经验在预防接受手工闭合患者发生BPF方面可发挥重要作用。与使用吻合器的成本相比,手工闭合是一种廉价且可靠的技术,适用于所有情况,并且可以传授给接受培训的外科医生,风险可接受。然而,缺乏证据表明在解剖性肺切除术后手工闭合优于机械吻合器闭合。