Garcia-Rubira Juan Carlos, Calvo-Taracido Manuel, Francisco-Aparicio Francisca, Almendro-Delia Manuel, Recio-Mayoral Alejandro, Reina Toral Antonio, Aramburu-Bodas Oscar, Gallego García de Vinuesa Pastora, Cruz Fernández José Maria, Alcántara Angel Garcia, Hidalgo-Urbano Rafael
Cardiology Department, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain,
Intern Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;9(7):759-65. doi: 10.1007/s11739-013-1032-9. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
The aim of the study was to determine the influence of the previous use of digoxin on the hospital mortality and complications of patients admitted because of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We analyzed the data of patients included in the ARIAM-Andalucia Registry, which involves 49 hospitals in Andalucia, Spain, from 2007 to 2012. Patients on digoxin treatment prior to their admission because of ACS constituted the digoxin group (DG), and were compared with the group of patients not on digoxin. Logistic regression and propensity score matching were used to analyze the differences. We included 20,331 patients, of whom 244 (1.2%) were on digoxin. DG patients were older (73.1 vs 63.7 years old), more often women, and had more diabetes, hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, obstructive pulmonary disease or kidney disease. On univariate analysis, DG patients had significantly higher hospital mortality (13.5 vs 5.3% P < 0.001), and more cardiogenic shock, but less ventricular fibrillation, and no differences in atrioventricular block, stroke or reinfarction. After the multivariate analysis, DG had no significant influence on hospital prognosis [odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.86]. The analysis of a propensity-matched cohort of 464 patients (232 DG and 232 NoDG) did not find differences in hospital mortality (13.4 vs 13.4%) nor other complications. In our cohort of ACS patients, the previous treatment with digoxin was not associated with an increase in dysrhythmic complications nor was an independent predictor of mortality during hospitalization.
本研究的目的是确定既往使用地高辛对因急性冠脉综合征(ACS)入院患者的医院死亡率及并发症的影响。我们分析了纳入ARIAM - 安达卢西亚注册研究的数据,该研究涉及西班牙安达卢西亚的49家医院,时间跨度为2007年至2012年。因ACS入院前接受地高辛治疗的患者构成地高辛组(DG),并与未使用地高辛的患者组进行比较。采用逻辑回归和倾向得分匹配法分析差异。我们纳入了20331例患者,其中244例(1.2%)使用地高辛。DG组患者年龄更大(73.1岁对63.7岁),女性更多,且患有更多的糖尿病、高血压、既往心肌梗死、心力衰竭、中风、心房颤动、外周血管疾病、阻塞性肺疾病或肾脏疾病。单因素分析显示,DG组患者的医院死亡率显著更高(13.5%对5.3%,P<0.001),心源性休克更多,但室颤更少,且房室传导阻滞、中风或再梗死无差异。多因素分析后,DG对医院预后无显著影响[比值比(OR)1.21,95%置信区间0.79 - 1.86]。对464例倾向得分匹配队列患者(232例DG和232例非DG)的分析未发现医院死亡率(13.4%对13.4%)及其他并发症存在差异。在我们的ACS患者队列中,既往地高辛治疗与心律失常并发症增加无关,也不是住院期间死亡率的独立预测因素。