Salas Maribel, Martin Michelle, Pisu Maria, McCall Erin, Zuluaga Alvaro, Glasser Stephen P
Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Regional Hospital of Specialties, Mexico City, Mexico.
Pharmaceut Med. 2008 Mar 1;22(2). doi: 10.1007/BF03256691.
Recent studies have suggested that there has been an increase in the number of 'warning letters' issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) despite the publication of the FDA advertising guidelines. However, limited information is available on the description of warning letters. The objective of this study was to analyse the frequency and content of FDA warning letters in relation to promotional claims and discuss the influence of regulatory and industry constraints on promotion.
All warning letters published by the FDA between 5 May 1995 and 11 June 2007 were reviewed. Warning letters related to promotional issues were included and analysed. Information related to the identification number, date of the warning letter, FDA division that issued the letter, drug name, manufacturer, specific warning problem, type of promotional material and requested action was extracted. Two independent investigators reviewed and classified each PDF file, any differences were discussed until a consensus was reached.
Between May 1995 and June 2007 a total of 8692 warning letters were issued, of which 25% were related to drugs. Of these, 206 warning letters focused on drug promotion and were included in this study: 23% were issued in 2005, 15% in 2004 and 14% in 1998. In total, 47% of the warning letters were issued because of false or misleading unapproved doses and uses, 27% failed to disclose risks, 15% cited misleading promotion, 8% related to misleading labelling and 3% promoted false effectiveness claims.
There is an important variation in the number of warning letters issued in the last decade, probably because of the increasing number of drugs approved by the FDA, drug withdrawal scandals, and the publication of the FDA and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) guidelines.
We found that benefit-related claims, such as unapproved uses or doses of drugs, and failure to disclose risks, are the main causes of FDA issued warning letters for promotional claims related to medications.
近期研究表明,尽管美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布了广告指南,但FDA发出的“警告信”数量仍有所增加。然而,关于警告信的描述信息有限。本研究的目的是分析FDA警告信中与促销声明相关的频率和内容,并探讨监管和行业限制对促销的影响。
回顾了1995年5月5日至2007年6月11日期间FDA发布的所有警告信。纳入并分析与促销问题相关的警告信。提取与识别号、警告信日期、发出警告信的FDA部门、药品名称、制造商、具体警告问题、促销材料类型和要求采取的行动相关的信息。两名独立研究人员对每个PDF文件进行审查和分类,任何差异都进行讨论,直至达成共识。
1995年5月至2007年6月期间共发出8692封警告信,其中25%与药品有关。其中,206封警告信聚焦于药品促销并纳入本研究:23%于2005年发出,15%于2004年发出,14%于1998年发出。总体而言,47%的警告信是由于未经批准的剂量和用途存在虚假或误导性而发出的,27%未披露风险,15%引用了误导性促销,8%与误导性标签有关,3%宣传了虚假有效性声明。
过去十年发出的警告信数量存在重要差异,可能是由于FDA批准的药品数量增加、药品撤市丑闻以及FDA和美国制药研究与制造商协会(PhRMA)指南的发布。
我们发现,与益处相关的声明,如未经批准的药品用途或剂量,以及未披露风险,是FDA就药品促销声明发出警告信的主要原因。