Suppr超能文献

对照组中全视野、半视野和中央凹刺激模式反转视觉诱发电位潜伏期的系列测试变异性。

Variability on serial testing of pattern reversal visual evoked potential latencies from full-field, half-field and foveal stimulation in control subjects.

作者信息

Hammond S R, MacCallum S, Yiannikas C, Walsh J C, McLeod J G

出版信息

Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1987 Apr;66(4):401-8. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90209-4.

Abstract

The change in pattern reversal visual evoked potential (PRVEP) latency over time (test-retest variability, TRV) was assessed in 30 (16 males, 14 females) adult control subjects using full-field (FF), half-field (HF) and foveal (central-field, CF) stimulation. The mean test-retest interval (TRI) was 20.5 months with a range of 18-21.5 months. There were no significant test-retest latency differences in either sex and furthermore there were no significant inter-sex differences in any of the test-retest parameters. Because of the latter finding the test-retest upper limit of normal for each parameter as defined by the mean value + 2.5 S.D. was taken as the largest value obtained in either sex. Thus the test-retest upper limits of normal for absolute latency from FF, right HF, left HF and CF stimulation were 6, 7, 9 and 7 msec, respectively; for interocular latency differences (ILD) from FF and CF stimulation were 4 and 5 msec respectively; and for right HF to left HF intraocular latency difference (IOLD) was 7 msec. It is concluded that the TRV was sufficiently small in our control group with each of the stimulus techniques to make all of them potentially useful in serial PRVEP studies. Furthermore the extra information provided by CF and HF stimulation may increase the sensitivity and accuracy with which change can be monitored.

摘要

在30名(16名男性,14名女性)成年对照受试者中,采用全视野(FF)、半视野(HF)和中央凹(中心视野,CF)刺激,评估了模式翻转视觉诱发电位(PRVEP)潜伏期随时间的变化(重测变异性,TRV)。平均重测间隔(TRI)为20.5个月,范围为18至21.5个月。两性的重测潜伏期均无显著差异,而且在任何重测参数中两性之间也无显著差异。由于后一发现,将每个参数的正常重测上限定义为平均值 + 2.5标准差,取两性中获得的最大值。因此,FF、右侧HF、左侧HF和CF刺激的绝对潜伏期正常重测上限分别为6、7、9和7毫秒;FF和CF刺激的两眼间潜伏期差异(ILD)分别为4和5毫秒;右侧HF与左侧HF眼内潜伏期差异(IOLD)为7毫秒。结论是,在我们的对照组中,每种刺激技术的TRV都足够小,使得它们在系列PRVEP研究中都可能有用。此外,CF和HF刺激提供的额外信息可能会提高监测变化的敏感性和准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验