• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚一家妇产医院外倒转术成功的预测因素

Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital.

作者信息

Mowat Alex, Gardener Glenn

机构信息

Greenslopes Obstetric and Gynaecology Group, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Feb;54(1):59-63. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12152. Epub 2013 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1111/ajo.12152
PMID:24359099
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are minimal data involving predictors of success of external cephalic version (ECV) in an Australian healthcare setting.

AIMS

To determine the predictors of successful ECV as well as the success rate of ECV and the mode of, and presentation at, delivery for women undergoing ECV for breech presentation from 36-weeks gestation.

METHODS

A prospective review was carried out on all women who had undergone ECV from 36-weeks gestation at the Mater Mothers Hospital over an 8-year period from 2001 to 2008. Data were collected prospectively and were collated in conjunction with database review, chart review and telephonic patient interviews.

RESULTS

A total of 355 women underwent ECV for breech presentation. The overall success rate was 66% (57% for nulliparous, 76% for multiparous). A woman who underwent ECV had a 46% chance of a vaginal birth. If the ECV was successful, she had a 70% chance of vaginal birth. From bivariate analysis, parity, amniotic fluid index (AFI) and estimated fetal weight (EFW) were determined to be possible predictors of success of ECV and were included in the logistic regression modelling. In the regression analysis, multiparity increased the odds of successful ECV by 2.18. For every one unit increase in AFI, the odds of successful ECV increased by 1.18.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiparity and amniotic fluid volume as assessed by AFI were the significant predictors of immediate success of ECV. Conversely, lower AFI and nulliparity are factors that are likely to reduce the likelihood of successful ECV.

摘要

背景

在澳大利亚的医疗环境中,关于外倒转术(ECV)成功预测因素的数据极少。

目的

确定ECV成功的预测因素、ECV的成功率以及孕36周因臀位行ECV的女性的分娩方式和分娩时的表现。

方法

对2001年至2008年8年间在马特母亲医院孕36周后接受ECV的所有女性进行前瞻性回顾。前瞻性收集数据,并结合数据库审查、病历审查和电话患者访谈进行整理。

结果

共有355名女性因臀位接受了ECV。总体成功率为66%(初产妇为57%,经产妇为76%)。接受ECV的女性阴道分娩的几率为46%。如果ECV成功,她阴道分娩的几率为70%。通过双变量分析,确定产次、羊水指数(AFI)和估计胎儿体重(EFW)可能是ECV成功的预测因素,并纳入逻辑回归模型。在回归分析中,经产使ECV成功的几率增加2.18。AFI每增加一个单位,ECV成功的几率增加1.18。

结论

经产和通过AFI评估的羊水量是ECV即刻成功的重要预测因素。相反,较低的AFI和初产是可能降低ECV成功可能性的因素。

相似文献

1
Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital.澳大利亚一家妇产医院外倒转术成功的预测因素
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Feb;54(1):59-63. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12152. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
2
Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.外倒转术成功的预测因素:单中心经验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Apr;293(4):749-55. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3902-z. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
3
External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section.足月臀位时行外倒转术:成功率的预测因素,以及对剖宫产率的影响。
East Mediterr Health J. 2013 Feb;19(2):162-6.
4
Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.奥克兰外倒转术的应用取得了成功,但存在局限性。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;48(5):467-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00889.x.
5
Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks.预测 36 周后经皮外倒转术的成功率。
Am J Perinatol. 2011 Feb;28(2):103-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262909. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
6
External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.使用沙丁胺醇进行外倒转术——成功率及成功的预测因素
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Feb;19(2):91-4.
7
[Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].[实施改良头位转位方案后臀位分娩减少]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A63.
8
Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.外倒转术(ECV)试验后的分娩方式和新生儿结局:阴道臀位与头位分娩的前瞻性试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Apr;287(4):663-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2639-1. Epub 2012 Nov 25.
9
Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version.外倒转术成功的预后参数。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Sep;21(9):660-2. doi: 10.1080/14767050802244938.
10
External cephalic version (ECV): experience in a sub-Saharan African hospital.外倒转术(ECV):撒哈拉以南非洲一家医院的经验
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 May;26(4):317-20. doi: 10.1080/01443610600594948.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the effect of external cephalic version: a retrospective nationwide cohort analysis.影响外倒转术效果的因素:一项回顾性全国队列分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;308(4):1127-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06763-2. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Assessment of the Successful External Cephalic Version Prognostic Parameters Effect on Final Mode of Delivery.评估成功的外倒转术预后参数对最终分娩方式的影响。
Cureus. 2021 Jul 26;13(7):e16637. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16637. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Height of elevated fetal buttock for prediction of successful external cephalic version.
抬高胎儿臀部的高度用于预测外倒转术的成功率。
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Jan;63(1):13-18. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.1.13. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
4
External Cephalic Version: A Dying Art Worth Reviving.外倒转术:一门值得复兴的渐趋式微的技艺。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018 Dec;68(6):493-497. doi: 10.1007/s13224-018-1090-z. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Applying the Newman-Peacock Prognostic System to a Portuguese Obstetrical Population - A Useful Tool?将纽曼 - 皮科克预后系统应用于葡萄牙产科人群——一个有用的工具?
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Jan;40(1):4-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606243. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
6
Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.2002-2012 年澳大利亚人群研究:足月臀位行外倒转术的情况。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jul 26;17(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1430-5.
7
Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following successful external cephalic version.成功实施外倒转术后的产时干预率及围产期结局
J Perinatol. 2016 Jun;36(6):439-42. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.220. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Sonographic assessment of placental location: a mere notional description or an important key to improve both pregnancy and perinatal obstetrical care? A large cohort study.胎盘位置的超声评估:仅仅是一种概念性描述还是改善孕期及围产期产科护理的重要关键?一项大型队列研究。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):13056-66. eCollection 2015.