Lotfipour Farzaneh, Valizadeh Hadi, Hallaj-Nezhadi Somayeh, Milani Morteza, Zakeri-Milani Parvin
Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. ; Drug Applied Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,Tabriz, Iran.
Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Iran J Pharm Res. 2010 Winter;9(1):27-35.
An agar well diffusion bioassay method for determination of clarithromycin in human plasma, using Micrococcus Luteus ATCC 9341 as the assay organism, was compared with a selective high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with UV detection. Spiked plasma was used to prepare standard and control samples for both methods. The results of the bioassay analyses with spiked plasma samples were concordant by HPLC methods (R(2) =0.871, P < 0.001).The Bland-Altman method also showed good agreement between the results of two methods. HPLC demonstrated an improved precision (0.88-19.86% versus 4.51-26.78%) and accuracy (99.27-103.42 % versus 78.52-131.19 %), compared to those of the bioassay method. The range of linearity obtained by both methods (from 62.5 to 3000 ng/ml for HPLC and from 250 to 3000 ng/ml for the bioassay) includes the range of concentrations of clarithromycin which are considered clinically relevant. However, comparison between HPLC and microbiological assays after oral administration of clarithromycin in healthy volunteers indicated significant differences between the two methods in mean plasma concentration-time profiles. The Bland-Altman method revealed no agreement between the two methods, which can be explained by the presence of active metabolites of clarithromycin in plasma.
采用藤黄微球菌ATCC 9341作为检测菌,建立了一种测定人血浆中克拉霉素的琼脂孔扩散生物测定法,并与具有紫外检测的选择性高效液相色谱(HPLC)法进行了比较。两种方法均使用加标血浆制备标准品和对照品。加标血浆样品的生物测定分析结果与HPLC法一致(R(2)=0.871,P<0.001)。Bland-Altman法也表明两种方法的结果具有良好的一致性。与生物测定法相比,HPLC法的精密度(0.88-19.86%对4.51-26.78%)和准确度(99.27-103.42%对78.52-131.19%)有所提高。两种方法获得的线性范围(HPLC法为62.5至3000 ng/ml,生物测定法为250至3000 ng/ml)均包括临床上认为相关的克拉霉素浓度范围。然而,健康志愿者口服克拉霉素后HPLC法与微生物测定法的比较表明,两种方法在平均血浆浓度-时间曲线上存在显著差异。Bland-Altman法显示两种方法之间不一致,这可以用血浆中克拉霉素活性代谢物的存在来解释。