Agnesod Danilo, De Nicolò Amedeo, Simiele Marco, Mohamed Abdi Adnan, Boglione Lucio, Di Perri Giovanni, D'Avolio Antonio
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetic; Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Department of Medical Sciences, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetic; Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, Department of Medical Sciences, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Turin, Italy.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014 Mar;90:119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.11.027. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
The current standard-of-care therapy in HCV consists in ribavirin (RBV) plus pegylated-interferon-α 2a or 2b and, for HCV-1 infected patients, also directly acting antivirals (DAAs). Despite the increase in the number of patients who reach sustained virological response (SVR) for HCV-1, a great inter-individual variability in the response to therapy remains. Whether new drugs are available in combination with RBV and Peg-IFN for HCV-1, the treatment of the other viral genotypes remains the same: this issue highlights the lasting importance of RBV and Peg-IFN in anti-HCV treatment. Moreover, a strong limiting factor to the usefulness of anti-HCV treatment remains the occurrence of adverse events, first of all hemolytic anemia, which have increased with the addition of DAAs, but is mainly an RBV-dependent effect. For these reasons, the monitoring of RBV exposure in the various compartments should be important. Since the routinely determination of RBV in the target cells as the hepatocytes is impracticable for of its invasiveness, the quantification in easier to obtain cells could be a good choice. In this work, we developed and validated an ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) assay method to quantify RBV concentrations in peripheral blood mononucleated cells (PBMCs). QCs were prepared with RBV and RBV-monophosphate (RMP). Each sample was divided into two aliquots, which undergone the same extraction procedure: one was treated with acid phosphatase to convert RBV phosphorylated metabolites into free RBV, the other one was not-treated. The extracts were analyzed with reverse-phase column with UPLC-MS/MS. Calibration curves fitted a least squares model (weighed 1/X) for ribavirin levels in a range from 0.1 ng to 200 ng (mean r(2)=0.9993). Accuracy, intra-day and inter-day precision of the methods were in accordance with FDA guidelines. Moreover, phosphorylated QCs were used to assess the correct determination of total RBV concentration. We tested this method by monitoring RBV concentrations in PBMCs from 20 HCV+ patients, receiving alpha interferon-plus RBV combination therapy. This method showed to be reliable, precise, accurate and suitable for evaluation of intracellular RBV concentrations.
丙型肝炎目前的标准治疗方案是利巴韦林(RBV)联合聚乙二醇化干扰素-α 2a或2b,对于丙型肝炎病毒1型(HCV-1)感染患者,还包括直接抗病毒药物(DAA)。尽管实现HCV-1持续病毒学应答(SVR)的患者数量有所增加,但治疗反应的个体差异仍然很大。无论是否有新药与RBV和聚乙二醇化干扰素联合用于HCV-1治疗,其他病毒基因型的治疗方案仍保持不变:这一问题凸显了RBV和聚乙二醇化干扰素在抗HCV治疗中的持续重要性。此外,抗HCV治疗有效性的一个重要限制因素仍然是不良事件的发生,首先是溶血性贫血,随着DAA的加入,其发生率有所增加,但主要是一种依赖RBV的效应。出于这些原因,监测RBV在各个部位的暴露情况应该很重要。由于常规测定靶细胞(如肝细胞)中的RBV具有侵入性,不切实际,因此在较易获取的细胞中进行定量可能是个不错的选择。在这项研究中,我们开发并验证了一种超高效液相色谱-串联质谱(UPLC-MS/MS)检测方法,用于定量外周血单核细胞(PBMC)中的RBV浓度。用RBV和单磷酸利巴韦林(RMP)制备质量控制样品(QC)。每个样品分成两份等分试样,进行相同的提取程序:一份用酸性磷酸酶处理,将RBV磷酸化代谢产物转化为游离RBV,另一份不处理。提取物用反相柱通过UPLC-MS/MS进行分析。校准曲线对利巴韦林水平在0.1 ng至200 ng范围内拟合最小二乘法模型(权重为1/X)(平均r(2)=0.9993)。该方法的准确度、日内和日间精密度均符合美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的指导原则。此外,可以使用磷酸化的QC来评估总RBV浓度的正确测定。我们通过监测20例接受α干扰素加RBV联合治疗的HCV阳性患者PBMC中的RBV浓度来测试该方法。该方法显示出可靠、精确、准确,适用于评估细胞内RBV浓度。