Ilizarov 外固定架与 Ortho-SUV 框架矫正股骨畸形的对比研究。

A comparative study of the correction of femoral deformity between the Ilizarov apparatus and Ortho-SUV Frame.

机构信息

Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, 8 Baykova Str., St. Petersburg, 195427, Russia,

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2014 Apr;38(4):865-72. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2247-0. Epub 2013 Dec 28.

Abstract

PURPOSES

This study compared the six-axis external fixator Ortho-SUV Frame (OSF) and the Ilizarov apparatus (IA) in femoral deformity correction. Our specific questions were: (1) which of the fixators (OSF or IA) provides shorter period of femoral deformity correction, and (2) which of the fixators (OSF or IA) provides better accuracy of correction.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 123 cases of femoral deformities (127 femora): 45 (47) treated with OSF (20 male and 27 female) and 78 (80) with IA (53 male and 27 female). The average age in the OSF group was 34.6 (range, 18-66) and in the IA group 35.8 (range, 18-76). All the deformities were categorized according to the number of planes and deformity components as simple, middle and complex deformities.

RESULTS

Elimination of simple deformities in the IA group took 58.3 ± 21.4 days, EFI 58.8 ± 39.8 days/cm, and lengthening was 4.6 ± 1.98 cm. Middle deformities were 71.3 ± 26.2, 61.9 ± 30.3 and 4 ± 2, respectively. In complex deformities we had 105.2 ± 21.8, 79.3 ± 35.4 and 3.2 ± 1.45, respectively. Normal alignment was achieved in 55.0% of cases in IA. In 45.0% of cases we had residual deformity. Elimination of simple deformations in the OSF group took 55.3 ± 12.8 days, EFI 47.5 ± 23 days/cm, and lengthening 4.5 ± 1.1 сm. Middle deformities were 43.6 ± 18.9, 59 ± 14.6 and 3.6 ± 2, respectively. In complex deformities we had 44.9 ± 11.5, 57.5 ± 9.4 and 3.6 ± 1.7, respectively. In the OSF group normal alignment was achieved in 85.1%. In 14.9% there was residual deformity.

CONCLUSION

Using OSF simplifies deformity correction and reduces its period by 2.3 times in complex deformities and by 1.6 times in middle deformities. Accuracy of correction with OSF was significantly higher than correction with IA.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了六轴外固定架 Ortho-SUV 框架(OSF)和伊利扎洛夫(Ilizarov)器械(IA)在股骨畸形矫正中的应用。我们的具体问题是:(1)哪种固定器(OSF 或 IA)提供更短的股骨畸形矫正周期,(2)哪种固定器(OSF 或 IA)提供更好的矫正精度。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 123 例股骨畸形(127 股骨):45 例(47 侧)采用 OSF(20 例男性,27 例女性),78 例(80 侧)采用 IA(53 例男性,27 例女性)。OSF 组的平均年龄为 34.6(范围,18-66),IA 组为 35.8(范围,18-76)。所有畸形均根据平面数和畸形成分进行分类,分为单纯性、中间性和复杂性畸形。

结果

IA 组单纯性畸形消除时间为 58.3±21.4 天,EFI 为 58.8±39.8 cm/cm,延长长度为 4.6±1.98 cm。中间畸形分别为 71.3±26.2、61.9±30.3 和 4.0±2。复杂畸形中,我们分别有 105.2±21.8、79.3±35.4 和 3.2±1.45。IA 组 55.0%的病例达到正常对线。45.0%的病例存在残余畸形。OSF 组单纯性畸形消除时间为 55.3±12.8 天,EFI 为 47.5±23.0 cm/cm,延长长度为 4.5±1.1 cm。中间畸形分别为 43.6±18.9、59.0±14.6 和 3.6±2。复杂畸形分别为 44.9±11.5、57.5±9.4 和 3.6±1.7。OSF 组 85.1%的病例达到正常对线。14.9%的病例存在残余畸形。

结论

使用 OSF 简化了畸形矫正,并将复杂畸形的矫正时间缩短了 2.3 倍,中间畸形的矫正时间缩短了 1.6 倍。OSF 的矫正精度明显高于 IA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索